Archaeological Damage Assessment in Conflict Zones
Integrating Satellite Imagery and Ground Surveys in Daraa, Syria
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12429720 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amal Al Kassem (0009-0006-8394-004X, Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology University of Cologne Cologne Germany, corresponding author), Kristen Hopper (0000-0002-3656-4305, Department of Archaeology Durham University Durham UK), Ismael M Ibraheem (0000-0001-6228-246X, Institute of Geophysics and Meteorology University of Cologne Cologne Germany), Andreas Maier (0000-0002-5021-3341, Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology University of Cologne Cologne Germany), Mohammad Khair Nassrallah (Directorate‐General of Antiquities and Museums Damascus Syria), Jürgen Richter (0000-0003-2793-7867, Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology University of Cologne Cologne Germany) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archaeological Prospection (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1075-2196 • E-ISSN: 1099-0763 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/arp.70026 |
| OpenAlex | W4417460077 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
Satellite remote sensing is among the most significant modern methodologies supporting field archaeology. In addition to its efficiency in identifying archaeological sites, remote sensing offers a safe and cost‐effective approach in conflict zones. However, supplementing it with field investigations enhances accuracy by confirming or correcting results. For Daraa, southern Syria, freely available high‐resolution satellite imagery has been used effectively in documenting 196 archaeological sites. However, during ground‐truthing of 28 sites, significant discrepancies were observed, reinforcing the notion that remote sensing and fieldwork are complementary methods, giving best results when used jointly. This integration enables precise damage assessment and helps prioritize sites for urgent protection or excavation. Our field visits identified several sites requiring urgent excavation, particularly where looting pits have exposed stratigraphy—evidence that remote sensing alone cannot verify. Finally, engaging local communities and understanding both environmental and social conditions are essential for maximizing the effectiveness of integrating remote sensing with field investigations
Aerial Survey · Earth observation satellite · Field (mathematics · Looting · Satellite · Satellite imagery · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and Historical Studies
Assessment of the impact of the Syrian conflict on archaeological sites in the Daraa region
Snapshots from the past
Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology
Satellite imagery-based monitoring of archaeological site damage in the Syrian civil war
From Above and on the Ground
Historical Landscape of Sistan in Iran and Afghanistan
Interferometric SAR and Machine Learning
Applying Geomatics Techniques for Documenting Heritage Buildings in Aswan Region, Egypt
The impact of the Syrian conflict on archaeological sites in Al-Hasakah province
Satellite-Based Monitoring of Looting and Damage to Archaeological Sites in Syria
Satellite imagery as a resource in the prospection for archaeological sites in central Syria
Looting and vandalism around a World Heritage Site
Monitoring Islamic Archaeological Landscapes in Ethiopia Using Open Source Satellite Imagery
Developing a Heritage Database for the Middle East and North Africa
Patterns of looting in southern Iraq
Satellite evidence of archaeological site looting in Egypt
An Update on the Looting of Archaeological Sites in Iraq
Archaeological Looting in Egypt
Satellite Imagery-Based Analysis of Archaeological Looting in Syria
Corona satellite photography
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |