Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Artificial Intelligence in Archaeological Geophysics

Testing ChatGPT‐4o on Magnetometer Data From Sapallitepa (Uzbekistan)

Bibliographic Data

ID12429855
AuthorsAzamat Zakirov (0000-0002-9245-6747, Laboratory of Geophysics and Nanomineralogy Center for Advanced Technologies (CAT) Tashkent Uzbekistan, corresponding author), Ilyas Yanbukhtin (0000-0003-0019-9702, Laboratory of Geophysics and Nanomineralogy Center for Advanced Technologies (CAT) Tashkent Uzbekistan), Andreas Stele (0000-0001-7164-9315, Bavarian State Department for Monuments and Sites (BLfD) Munich Germany), Ulugbek Musaev (Laboratory of Geophysics and Nanomineralogy Center for Advanced Technologies (CAT) Tashkent Uzbekistan), Jorg W E Fassbinder (0000-0003-4271-1153, Geophysics Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University of Munich (LMU) Munich Germany)
Year2025
Volume33
Issue1
Pages3-20
Publication date2025-09-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeological Prospection (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-2196 • E-ISSN: 1099-0763
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/arp.70006
OpenAlexW4414026901
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

Archaeogeophysical prospection methods have become essential for the preparation and implementation of archaeological projects. This study evaluates the potential of ChatGPT‐4o, a large language model (LLM), to process grid‐based magnetometer data collected near the Late Bronze Age site of Sapallitepa in Uzbekistan (ca. 1600–1200 bce ). The aim was to assess whether natural language interaction could serve as a viable alternative to traditional software pipelines such as Geoplot 4.0. Both approaches—Geoplot and ChatGPT—were used to process the same field dataset, resulting in detailed magnetic anomaly maps that revealed subsurface archaeological features. While Geoplot required expert operation and domain‐specific configuration, ChatGPT processed the data based solely on textual prompts. In this study, ChatGPT‐4o is treated as a natural language interface for applying standard geophysical processing steps. Our findings indicate that ChatGPT, when guided by well‐formulated instructions, can deliver results comparable to those of specialized geophysical software. While domain expertise remains essential for meaningful interpretation, such tools could lower the barrier to entry for archaeological data processing. These results suggest a promising future for integrating AI‐driven methodologies into archaeogeophysical workflows, improving both accessibility and automation in data analysis

Archaeology · Geography · Magnetic field · Magnetometer · Physics · Remote sensing · Archaeological Research and Protection · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Geology · Geophysics

  • Navigating the AI Revolution in the Era of Community-Accountable Archaeological Praxis

    Open Access•Melanie Cootsona, Mario Alberto Castillo et al.•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2026

  • The Future of Archaeological Prospection

    Open Access•Deborah S Davis, C P Lipo•Archaeological Prospection•2026

  • Machine Learning

    Open Access•Iqbal H Sarker•SN Computer Science•2021

  • The Metallurgy of the Late Bronze Age Sapalli Culture (Southern Uzbekistan) and its implications for the 'tin question'

    Kai Kaniuth•Iranica Antiqua•2007

  • ChatGPT as a Digital Assistant for Archaeology

    Open Access•Gabriele Ciccone•Heritage•2024

  • Interacting with the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Language Model ChatGPT

    Open Access•Άθως Αγαπίου, Vasiliki Lysandrou•Heritage•2023

  • Large Language Models and Generative AI, Oh My

    Open Access•Peter J Cobb•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2023

  • ArchGeoRobot

    Open Access•Lieven Verdonck•ArchéoSciences•2021

  • Debating AI in Archaeology

    Open Access•Martina Tenzer, Giada Pistilli et al.•Internet Archaeology•2024

  • Using deep neural networks on airborne laser scanning data

    Open Access•Øivind Due Trier, Dave Cowley et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2018

  • The Anomaly Extractor—An Open‐Source GIS‐Tool for Object‐Based Image Analyses of Large‐Scale Geomagnetic Data

    Open Access•Lukas Goldmann, Rainer Komp•Archaeological Prospection•2025

  • Seeing beneath the farmland, steppe and desert soil

    Open Access•Jorg W E Fassbinder•Journal of Archaeological Science•2015

  • Broadscale deep learning model for archaeological feature detection across the Maya area

    Open Access•Leila Character, Tim Beach et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2024

  • Drone-based magnetometer prospection for archaeology

    Open Access•Andreas Stele, Leon Kaub et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2023

  • Moated site object detection using time series satellite imagery and an improved deep learning model in northeast Thailand

    Open Access•Hong Yang, Shaohua Wang et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2024

  • Managing Artificial Intelligence in Archeology. An overview

    Open Access•Gabriele Gattiglia•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2025

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae