Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Automated Detection of Hillforts in Remote Sensing Imagery With Deep Multimodal Segmentation

Bibliographic Data

ID12430265
AuthorsDaniel Canedo (0000-0002-5184-3265, IEETA/DETI University of Aveiro Aveiro Portugal), J Fonte (0000-0003-0367-0598, Department of Archaeology and History University of Exeter Exeter UK, corresponding author), Rita Dias (0000-0003-2999-3133, ERA Arqueologia Calçada de Santa Catarina Cruz Quebrada Portugal), Tiago Do Pereiro (0000-0003-2691-4583, ERA Arqueologia Calçada de Santa Catarina Cruz Quebrada Portugal), Luís Gonçalves‐Seco (0000-0002-8950-5499, UMAIA University of Maia Maia Portugal), Marta Vázquez (0000-0001-5261-4926, UMAIA University of Maia Maia Portugal), Pétia Georgieva (0000-0002-6424-6590, IEETA/DETI University of Aveiro Aveiro Portugal), António J R Neves (0000-0001-5433-6667, IEETA/DETI University of Aveiro Aveiro Portugal)
Year2024
Volume32
Issue2
Pages297-311
Publication date2024-09-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeological Prospection (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-2196 • E-ISSN: 1099-0763
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/arp.1958
OpenAlexW4402556361
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited37

Recent advancements in remote sensing and artificial intelligence can potentially revolutionize the automated detection of archaeological sites. However, the challenging task of interpreting remote sensing imagery combined with the intricate shapes of archaeological sites can hinder the performance of computer vision systems. This work presents a computer vision system trained for efficient hillfort detection in remote sensing imagery. Equipped with an adapted multimodal semantic segmentation model, the system integrates LiDAR‐derived LRM images and aerial orthoimages for feature fusion, generating a binary mask pinpointing detected hillforts. Post‐processing includes margin and area filters to remove edge inferences and smaller anomalies. The resulting inferences are subjected to hard positive and negative mining, where expert archaeologists classify them to populate the training data with new samples for retraining the segmentation model. As the computer vision system is far more likely to encounter background images during its search, the training data are intentionally biased towards negative examples. This approach aims to reduce the number of false positives, typically seen when applying machine learning solutions to remote sensing imagery. Northwest Iberia experiments witnessed a drastic reduction in false positives, from 5678 to 40 after a single hard positive and negative mining iteration, yielding a 99.3% reduction, with a resulting F 1 score of 66%. In England experiments, the system achieved a 59% F 1 score when fine‐tuned and deployed countrywide. Its scalability to diverse archaeological sites is demonstrated by successfully detecting hillforts and other types of enclosures despite their typical complex and varied shapes. Future work will explore archaeological predictive modelling to identify regions with higher archaeological potential to focus the search, addressing processing time challenges

Aerial imagery · Computer vision · Deep learning · Remote sensing · Segmentation · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Artificial Intelligence · Geology

  • The Importance of Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation for Computer Vision in Archaeology

    Open Access•M D Mccoy, Hannah Moncrieff•Heritage•2026

  • Drone and airborne lidar in Greece

    Jesús García Sánchez, Lieve Donnellan et al.•JOURNAL OF GREEK ARCHAEOLOGY•2025

  • Using Simulated Training Data to Locate Archaeological Sites with Machine Learning

    Open Access•Katherine Peck, Claudine Gravel-Miguel et al.•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2026

  • Tracing Past Agrarian Field Systems Through Ai‐Based Analysis of Satellite Imagery in Konya, Central Anatolia, Türkiye

    Open Access•Melda Küçükdemirci•Archaeological Prospection•2025

  • Sensores con sentido y sensibilidad. Un enfoque crítico sobre el método en la arqueología geomática y no invasiva

    Open Access•Victorino Mayoral Herrera•Complutum•2025

  • ImageNet

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong et al.•2009 IEEE Conference on Computer…•2009

  • Automated detection of archaeological mounds using machine-learning classification of multisensor and multitemporal satellite data

    Open Access•Hector A Orengo, Francesc C Conesa et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Why Not a Single Image? Combining Visualizations to Facilitate Fieldwork and On-Screen Mapping

    Open Access•Žiga Kokalj, Maja Somrak•Remote Sensing•2019

  • Machine Learning for Cultural Heritage

    Open Access•Marco Fiorucci, Marina Khoroshiltseva et al.•Pattern Recognition Letters•2020

  • Combined Detection and Segmentation of Archeological Structures from LiDAR Data Using a Deep Learning Approach

    Open Access•Alexandre Guyot, Marc Lennon et al.•Journal of Computer Applications…•2021

  • Implementing State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Approaches for Archaeological Object Detection in Remotely-Sensed Data

    Open Access•Martin S Olivier, Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart•Journal of Computer Applications…•2021

  • Self-Supervised Learning for Semantic Segmentation of Archaeological Monuments in DTMs

    Open Access•Bashir Kazimi, Monika Sester•Journal of Computer Applications…•2023

  • Theoretical Repositioning of Automated Remote Sensing Archaeology

    Open Access•Deborah S Davis•Journal of Computer Applications…•2021

  • LiDAR Applications in Archaeology

    Open Access•G Vinci, Federica Vanzani et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2025

  • An approach to the automatic surveying of prehistoric barrows through LiDAR

    Open Access•Enrique Cerrillo-Cuenca•Quaternary International•2017

  • Spatial analysis of hillfort locations in the Chełmno Land (Poland) using digital terrain analysis and stochastic data exploration

    Open Access•Zbigniew Podgórski, Dawid Szatten et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2021

  • Objective comparison of relief visualization techniques with deep CNN for archaeology

    Open Access•Alexandre Guyot, Marc Lennon et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2021

  • LiDAR‐derived Local Relief Models – a new tool for archaeological prospection

    Open Access•Ralf Hesse•Archaeological Prospection•2010

  • Automated methods for image detection of cultural heritage

    Open Access•Ariele Câmara, Ana De Almeida et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2022

  • A Comparison of Visualization Techniques for Models Created from Airborne Laser Scanned Data

    Open Access•Rebecca Bennett, Kate Welham et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2012

  • Applying automated object detection in archaeological practice

    Open Access•Wouter B Verschoof-Van Der Vaart, Karsten Lambers•Archaeological Prospection•2021

  • A Template‐matching Approach Combining Morphometric Variables for Automated Mapping of Charcoal Kiln Sites

    Open Access•Anna Schneider, Melanie Takla et al.•Archaeological Prospection•2014

  • Deep learning reveals extent of Archaic Native American shell-ring building practices

    Open Access•Deborah S Davis, Gino Caspari et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2021

  • Visualization of lidar-derived relief models for detection of archaeological features

    Open Access•Benjamin Štular, Žiga Kokalj et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2012

  • Italy’s Hidden Hillforts

    Open Access•G Fontana•Journal of Field Archaeology•2022

  • Defining what we study

    Open Access•Deborah S Davis, Dylan S Davis•Digital Applications in…•2020

  • Eyes of the machine

    Open Access•James Zimmer-Dauphinee, Parker Vanvalkenburgh et al.•Antiquity•2024

Unique citing works5
Citations per year5
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae