A Global Regime for Cybersecurity and the Obstacles to Future Progress
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12430433 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nir Hassid (0000-0001-6079-2730, Tel Aviv University The School of Political Science, Government and International Affairs Tel Aviv Israel, corresponding author), Eviatar Matania (0000-0002-2630-8244, Tel Aviv University The School of Political Science, Government and International Affairs Tel Aviv Israel) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 13-40 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1075-2846 • E-ISSN: 1942-6720 |
| Publisher | Lynne Rienner Publishers (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1163/19426720-03001002 |
| OpenAlex | W4409944690 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
This article examines the theoretical foundations of international security and regime theory that lay strict conditions for the creation of international regimes to explain the nature of the cyber conflict and the reasons that prevent the creation of a global regime for cybersecurity. This article analyzes the cybersecurity concerns and interests of the world’s leading powers in cyberspace—China, Russia, the European Union, and the United States—based on some key cybersecurity issues in dispute, inter alia, information sovereignty, militarization of cyberspace, and their politics of cyber norms. The article suggests that the absence of a dominant hegemon in the international system, and the perception of cyberspace not only as a domain that increases vulnerabilities and threats, but also as a domain for gaining a strategic advantage, does not meet the theoretical premises for the creation of an international regime
Computer security · International law · Political science · Public international law · Computer Science · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law
National Interests in International Society
The global governance complexity cube
After Hegemony
International Organization
Wilson and China
Great Power Management in International Society
A Cyberwar of Ideas? Deterrence and Norms in Cyberspace
Internet Governance in a Multipolar World
Breaking Out of the Security Dilemma
From Moscow with coercion
The Revolution in Military Affairs with Chinese Characteristics
Deterrence is Not a Credible Strategy for Cyberspace
Why nations cooperate
The Brussels Effect
Managed Pluralism
Elections Without Democracy
Sources of Transparency
Coordination and collaboration
Explaining the non-proliferation regime
The hegemon's dilemma
The Dynamics of Regime Complexes
Regime Complexes
Trickstery
Information control by public punishment
| Highly cited | No |
|---|