Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Cardoso Report on the UN and Civil Society

Functionalism, Global Corporatism, or Global Democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID12430752
AuthorsPeter Willetts (0000-0002-6769-2377, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume12
Issue3
Pages305-324
Publication date2006-08-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-2846 • E-ISSN: 1942-6720
PublisherLynne Rienner Publishers (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1163/19426720-01203006
OpenAlexW331953647
LanguageEN
Citations received19

The Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations was published in June 2004. It strongly endorsed the case for wider participation of civil society in all aspects of the UN's work, both at the headquarters and at the country level. However, the Panel members displayed little understanding of the existing NGO consultative arrangements. Many of its recommendations were impolitic or impractical. The report was intellectually incoherent because it embodied three competing theoretical frameworks: functionalism, neocorporatism, and democratic pluralism. The functionalist emphasis on expertise and the neocorporatist emphasis on engaging stakeholders cannot offer criteria for participation on an all-embracing democratic basis. Reform is needed provide facilities and resources enhance participation by marginalized groups. KEYWORDS: nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), United Nations, global civil society, Cardoso Report, functionalism, neocorporatism, legitimacy, participation. ********** Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have been important participants in the United Nations system since 1945. They have access intergovernmental meetings, present written statements, make speeches, and lobby for specific texts be adopted. For the first twenty-five years, fewer than 400 NGOs were registered with the UN, and at any particular meeting only a few of these were active, mainly behind the scenes. During the 1970s, a series of major UN conferences stimulated a tremendous growth in the number of NGOs, the range of issues addressed, the types of activities undertaken, the amount of media coverage, and the extent of influence achieved. Now more than 3,000 NGOs are registered as having consultative status, and many more have some involvement in UN policymaking. However, NGOs are still predominantly limited conferences and the subsidiary bodies of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). (1) They have no formal status within the General Assembly, the Security Council, or the international economic institutions. Many NGOs want their participation rights be extended these forums, but there is significant opposition this among the UN's member governments. A second problem is the imbalance within the NGO community at the UN between the numbers of individuals from North America and northern Europe and the lower numbers from other parts of the world, particularly from Africa. In this article, I analyze the conclusions of a review, known as the Cardoso Report, that was intended address these limitations the consultative arrangements and generate new ideas for civil society engagement with the UN. (2) There are three normative arguments for enhancing NGO participation in policymaking: the functionalist appeal for the use of expertise; the corporatist desire involve the affected interests; and the pluralist belief in democratic policymaking. The three arguments are all clearly present in the Cardoso Report, but confusion results because they are not compatible with each other. The first two approaches represent a threat the NGO participation rights that have been operating for the last sixty years at the United Nations. The only morally sound and politically feasible basis for legitimizing wider NGO participation in the UN system is the democratic claim for all voices be heard in global policy debates. The goals of extending ECOSOC participation rights other forums and of increased participation from civil society in developing countries will be analyzed below in this light. The Cardoso Panel on United Nations--Civil Society Relations The work of the Cardoso Panel must be seen as part of the reform process that Kofi Annan initiated as soon as he took office in January 1997. His first report launch the reforms called for the United Nations to engage civil society and make it a true partner in its work. (3) Progress was slow and many new ideas met with opposition

Civil society · Corporatism · Democracy · Functionalism (philosophy of mind · Legitimacy · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · International Development and Aid · Law · Public Administration

  • Supranational Citizenship Building and the United Nations

    Élise Auvachez•Global Governance A Review of…•2009

  • The Opening Up of International Organizations

    Open Access•Jonas Tallberg, Thomas Sommerer et al.•Opening up of International…•2013

  • Civil Society at the United Nations Through the Lens of Organizational Sociology

    Open Access•Leah R Kimber•Swiss Journal of Sociology•2023

  • Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework

    Open Access•Roni Kay M O’Dell•Global Policy•2025

  • Pluralism and proportionality in the representation of European international civil society within the UN framework

    Barry Mowell•European Politics and Society•2017

  • The International Olympic Committee

    Open Access•Nicolien Van Luijk•International Area Studies Review•2018

  • From Sovereign Prerogatives to Metropolitan Rule? The Anarchical Society in the Urban Age

    Open Access•CHRISTIAN BRÜTSCH•International Studies Perspectives•2012

  • Addressing the Elephant in the Room

    Alfie Gaffney, Darrick Evensen•Global Environmental Politics•2019

  • Turkish NGOs in global governance – insights from Ecosoc engagements

    Open Access•Hüsrev Tabak, Gürhan Ünal et al.•Turkish Studies•2026

  • The ILO, social partners and the G20

    Open Access•Marieke Louis•Global Social Policy•2015

  • Transnational Social Movement Organizations and Counter-Hegemonic Struggles Today

    Open Access•Jackie Smith, Basak Gemici et al.•Journal of World-Systems Research•2018

  • The John W. Holmes Lecture

    Roger A Coate•Global Governance A Review of…•2009

  • Should I stay or should I go? Explaining variation in nonstate actor advocacy over time in global governance

    Open Access•Marcel Hanegraaff, Jorik Vergauwen et al.•Governance•2020

  • Ngo Legitimacy

    Erla Thrandardottir•Representation•2015

  • On the volatility of transnational actor populations

    Open Access•Andreas Nordang Uhre•International Political Science…•2020

  • Global Civil Society

    John S Dryzek•Annual Review of Political Science•2012

  • Normative arguments for non-state actor participation in international policymaking processes

    Open Access•Naghmeh Nasiritousi, Mattias Hjerpe et al.•European Journal of International…•2016

  • Transnational social movements and changing organizational fields in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries

    Open Access•Jackie Smith, Samantha Plummer et al.•Global Networks•2017

  • Peasants' rights and the UN system

    M Edelman, Carwil James et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2011

Unique citing works19
Citations per year1,12
Citation span2009 - 2026 (18)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 18

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae