Thinking About the Future of the UN System
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12430772 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alger Chadwick F (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 335-360 |
| Publication date | 1996-07-19 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1075-2846 • E-ISSN: 1942-6720 |
| Publisher | Lynne Rienner Publishers (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1163/19426720-002-03-90000004 |
| OpenAlex | W2498136069 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
In order to think about the UN, we must escape the narrow perspectives of daily press coverage as well as the mainstream of the scholarly agenda. 'The study and teaching about international relations is usually hung up on what's wrong with the picture: riots and their suppression, mil itary takeovers, drug traffic, corporate raids, financial psychoses, arm races, wars and rumors of wars. If you stand back and look at the whole scene, you see all kinds of international systems and arrangements that are working fairly well.1 Harlan Cleveland then offers these examples
Business · International law · International relations · Law and economics · Mainstream · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Public international law · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Finance
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1998 - 2001 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |