Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Multiple Exposures

Scientific Controversy, the Media, and Public Responses to Bisphenol A

Bibliographic Data

ID12431308
AuthorsPaul R Brewer (0000-0002-1202-3280, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA,, corresponding author), Barbara L Ley (0000-0002-6328-8270, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
Year2011
Volume33
Issue1
Pages76-97
Publication date2011-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Communication (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1075-5470 • E-ISSN: 1552-8545
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1075547010377879
OpenAlexW2047703296
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited36

The controversy surrounding the potential health effects of bisphenol A (BPA) has recently spread from the scientific arena to mass mediated public debate. This study presents a theoretical account of low-information rationality to explain why media use (including newspaper use and online health information use) and confidence in key actors (including business, the Food and Drug Administration, and scientists) may predict public responses to BPA. It then analyzes survey data to examine how these factors are related to familiarity with BPA, concern about it, support for a ban on it, and behaviors to reduce exposure to it

Advertising · Business · Environmental health · Epistemology · Food and drug administration · Mass media · Newspaper · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public opinion · Public relations · Rationality · Scientific evidence · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management

  • Interpersonal risk communication matters more than media risk communication in its impact on individuals’ trust and preventive behaviors during Covid-19

    Open Access•Zakir Shah, Lu Wei•International Journal of Disaster…•2022

  • Framing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) risk

    Open Access•Kylie Morphett, Carla R Magi-Prowse et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Examining the impact of information sources in building consumer trust in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing industry

    Alan Abitbol, Nicole Lee et al.•Journal of Communication Management•2025

  • Chemical Controversy

    Paul R Brewer, David Wise et al.•Environmental Communication•2014

  • The psychology of ‘regrettable substitutions’

    Laura D Scherer, Andrew Maynard et al.•Health Risk & Society•2014

  • Dynamic development of public attitudes towards science policymaking

    Open Access•Keisuke Okamura•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube

    Open Access•Selina A Ruzi, Alan A Smith et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • Contested evidence

    Open Access•Paul R Brewer, Barbara L Ley•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming

    Open Access•Jay D Hmielowski, Lauren Feldman et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Science Exemplars in the Eye of the Beholder

    Open Access•Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia Knobloch‐westerwick et al.•Science Communication•2015

  • Cross-Sectional Association of Urinary Bisphenol A and Vaccine-Induced Immunity against Hepatitis B Virus

    Open Access•Jun Young Uhm, Hyoung‐Ryoul Kim et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Legislation by Agenda-Setting

    Simon Ki•Mass Communication & Society•2013

  • Public reception of scientific uncertainty in the endocrine disrupter controversy

    Laura Maxim, Pascale Mansier et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public Perceptions of Scientists

    Open Access•John C Besley, Nicole Lee et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Americans’ Support for Nasa’s James Webb Space Telescope

    Open Access•Ryan Weber, Semih Dinç et al.•Science Communication•2016

  • Framing Food Policy

    Open Access•Wendy M Rahn, Sarah E Gollust et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2017

  • Where Did All The Baby Bottles Go? Risk Perception, Interest Groups, Media Coverage and Institutional Imperatives in Canada's Regulation of Bisphenol A

    Open Access•Simon Ki, Simon Kiss•Canadian Journal of Political…•2014

  • The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig Priest, Heinz Bonfadelli et al.•Risk Analysis•2003

  • Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States

    Open Access•Paul M Kellstedt, Sammy Zahran et al.•Risk Analysis•2008

  • The Function of Credibility in Information Processing for Risk Perception

    Open Access•Craig W Trumbo, Katherine A Mccomas•Risk Analysis•2003

  • Cancer Information Scanning and Seeking Behavior is Associated with Knowledge, Lifestyle Choices, and Screening

    Minsun Shim, Bridget Kelly et al.•Journal of Health Communication•2006

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • The Reasoning Voter

    Samuel L Popkin•The Reasoning Voter•1991

  • A Grain of Truth

    Susanna Hornig Priest•Public Understanding of Science•2002

  • Trust in governance and the acceptance of genetically modified food in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Jan M Gutteling, Jan Gutteling et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2006

  • Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy

    Open Access•Matthew C Nisbet, Kirby Goidel et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Understanding public support for stem cell research

    Open Access•Hui Liu, Liu Hui et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  • From Pink to Green

    Barbara L Ley, Barbara Ley•From Pink to Green•2020

  • Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise

    Open Access•Matthew C Nisbet, Dietram A Scheufele et al.•Communication Research•2002

  • The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming

    Open Access•Ariel Malka, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Risk Analysis•2009

  • The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Risk Analysis•2000

  • Do Citizens Want to Have Their Say? Media, Agricultural Biotechnology, and Authoritarian Views of Democratic Processes in Science

    Dominique Brossard, Jarrod Shanahan•Mass Communication & Society•2003

  • Attitudes Toward Embryo Research, Worldviews, and the Moral Status of the Embryo Frame

    Open Access•Rafael Pardo, Rafael I Pardo et al.•Science Communication•2008

  • Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public

    Dominique Brossard, Matthew C Nisbet•International Journal of Public…•2006

  • The Competition for Worldviews

    Matthew C Nisbet•International Journal of Public…•2005

  • Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research

    Shirley S Ho, Dominique Brossard et al.•International Journal of Public…•2008

  • Gender Differences in Responses to News about Science and Technology

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig•Science Technology & Human Values•1992

  • Adult Science Learning from Local Television Newscasts

    Open Access•Jon D Miller, Eliene Augenbraun et al.•Science Communication•2006

  • Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology

    Open Access•John C Besley, Jarrod Shanahan et al.•Science Communication•2005

  • A Question of Balance

    Open Access•Christopher E Clarke•Science Communication•2008

  • Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies

    Open Access•Chul-Joo Lee, Chul‐joo Lee et al.•Science Communication•2005

  • Misplaced Faith

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig Priest•Science Communication•2001

  • Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News

    Open Access•Steven H Chaffee, Joan Schleuder•Human Communication Research•1986

Citations per year1.21
Citation span2012 - 2025 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae