Recovered memories of child sexual abuse and liability
Society, science, and the law in a comparative setting
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12434538 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David F Partlett (Emory University, corresponding author), Barry Nurcombe |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1253-1306 |
| Publication date | 1998-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychology Public Policy and Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1076-8971 • E-ISSN: 1939-1528 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/1076-8971.4.4.1253 |
| OpenAlex | W1967587732 |
| Language | EN |
This article considers the social and scientific dimensions of the phenomenon of recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse. The authors analyze how those dimensions have influenced the courts in dealing with claims arising from recovered memories. In particular, the article takes up the vexed issue of the liability of therapists who have allegedly induced false memories. As elsewhere, comparative legal analysis is used to attempt to describe and then prescribe how courts should define therapist liability. A resolution of the boundaries of liability turns upon the formulation of sound professional standards drawing upon policies embedded in the law and responsibilities of science and clinical practice
Child abuse · Child sexual abuse · Criminology · Epistemology · Legal liability · Liability · Medical emergency · Phenomenon · Poison control · Political science · Sexual abuse · Sociology · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |