A final reply to Grove and Barden
The relevance of the Rorschach Comprehensive System for expert testimony
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12434736 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barry A Ritzler (corresponding author), Barry Ritzler, Robert Erard (0000-0002-4848-5700), Gary Pettigrew |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 235-246 |
| Publication date | 2002-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychology Public Policy and Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1076-8971 • E-ISSN: 1939-1528 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/1076-8971.8.2.235 |
| OpenAlex | W2151733944 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 37 |
Eastern Louisiana Mental Health SystemIn reply to Grove et al. (2002), the authors attempt to limit their focus on thequestion of admissibility of the Rorschach Comprehensive System for experttestimony under the guidelines of the U.S. Supreme Court Daubert/Kumho/Joinerdecisions. The article refutes the argument that a “raging controversy” exists asevidence that the Rorschach is not accepted in the field of psychology. The authorsagain argue that Grove et al. have misconstrued the intent of Daubert/Kumho andmisidentify nonclinician academics as the appropriate evaluators of the admissibilityof the Rorschach. The authors add to their previous argument (2002) that theRorschach has sufficient reliability, validity, and error rates to be admissible underDaubert and conclude by countering the Grove et al. argument that the Journal ofPersonality Assessment is not an adequate forum for peer review of the Rorschach
Political science · Relevance (law · Rorschach test · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Law · Medical and Biological Sciences · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology · Social Psychology
Psychological testing and psychological assessment
Protecting the integrity of Rorschach expert witnesses
A scientist–practitioner's viewpoint on the admissibility of behavioral and social scientific information
The admissibility of behavioral science information in criminal trials
The problem of "helpfulness" in applying Daubert to expert testimony
Failure of Rorschach-Comprehensive-System-based testimony to be admissible under the Daubert-Joiner-Kumho standard
Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience
MMPI, Rorschach, and Wais
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2003 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |