Preparing children for cross-examination
How does intervention timing influence efficacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12434848 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah O’neill (0000-0001-8807-0991, University of Otago, corresponding author), Rachel Zajac (0000-0003-3040-4906, University of Otago) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 307-320 |
| Publication date | 2013-05-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychology Public Policy and Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1076-8971 • E-ISSN: 1939-1528 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0031538 |
| OpenAlex | W2326070789 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 15 |
Recent research has suggested that a comprehensive pretrial intervention utilizing a practice–feedback approach could help children to remain accurate in the face of challenging cross-examination questioning. We do not know, however, the extent to which this type of intervention remains effective as the delay between preparation intervention and cross-examination increases. To answer this question, 5- and 6-year olds (n = 88) and 9- and 10-year olds (n = 108) participated in a staged event and were then interviewed about it (direct examination). Six months later, children watched a videotape of this interview, and were then interviewed in an attempt to talk them out of their direct examination responses, regardless of accuracy (cross-examination). One day, 1 week, or 1 month prior to cross-examination, some children took part in a preparation intervention. These children were given practice at answering cross-examination-style questions about an unrelated topic, and received feedback on their responses. Remaining children received no preparation. Children's direct examination accuracy scores were high, but accuracy decreased markedly during cross-examination, especially for younger children. The preparation intervention significantly improved cross-examination accuracy above that of the control group when the program was delivered 1 day or 1 week prior to cross-examination, but not at a 1-month delay. Although the intervention conveyed considerable benefits, cross-examination still exerted a negative effect on children's accuracy in all preparation conditions. Our findings underscore the importance of considering not only the components of pretrial preparation programs, but also the timing of their delivery
Cross-examination · Developmental psychology · Empirical examination · Family medicine · Intervention (counseling · Oral examination · Physical examination · Psychiatry · Clinical Psychology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Family and Disability Support Research · Medicine · Psychology
Words Speak Louder Than Actions
Reducing the Potential for Distortion of Childhood Memories
Facilitating the Communicative Competence of the Child Witness
Child witnesses in criminal courts
An analysis of the prosecutory effects of a child sexual abuse victim-witness program
Learning rate, learning opportunities, and the development of forgetting
Some necessary conditions for producing reinstatement effects in children
Reinstatement effects in children
Children's recall 1 or 2 years after an event
Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults
Conservation
Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases
The effect of a five-month delay on children's and adults' eyewitness memory
The effects of repeated questioning on young children's eyewitness testimony
When and where do we apply what we learn
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |