Writing a Good Peer Review in Family and Consumer Sciences
Good Peer Review in Family and Consumer Sciences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12435325 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruben P Viramontez Anguiano (Bowling Green State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 93-95 |
| Publication date | 2011-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1077-727X • E-ISSN: 1552-3934 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02092.x |
| OpenAlex | W1502959453 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
The purpose of this paper was to illustrate how to write a good peer review. The paper provided defintions of peer reviews and blind reviews. It also provides an understanding of what to include in a peer review. Moreover, it recommends how to write a qualitative and quantitative peer review and different factors to avoid. The paper also illustrates how to write a review for a conceptual article. The paper concludes on how the peer review process contributes to scholarship and how the process makes a difference
Engineering ethics · Management science · Peer review · Political science · Process (computing · Scholarship · Technical peer review · Architecture, Design, and Social History · Computer Science · Engineering · Management and Marketing Education · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.23 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2024 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |