Cultural Planning in the United States
Toward Authentic Participation Using GIS
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12438588 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eleonora Redaelli (0000-0001-9122-6168, University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 642-669 |
| Publication date | 2012-05-07 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Affairs Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1078087412441158 |
| OpenAlex | W2009279006 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 66 |
In the United States, an important objective of cultural planning is creating a sense of place based on the needs and visions of the people living there through public involvement. However, the processes used to involve the community need more theoretical and methodological attention. The aim of this article is to suggest strategies, based on a clear definition of participation, that local governments can use to ensure community involvement. A review of the literature about public participation highlights the importance of educating and informing all the participants to incentivize a dialogical encounter. The objective is to go beyond one-way communication, where community members merely provide their input. In this article, the author demonstrates how a geographical information system (GIS) could be used by a local government to educate and inform all the participants delivering technical and scientific knowledge. The communicative strengths of a GIS could create the foundation for a planning process based on a dialogical exchange. The author provides two suggestions for such a process using Madison, Wisconsin, as an example. Finally, she recommends the use of these suggestions as an operational model for future cultural planning processes and suggests directions for future research
Dialogical self · Foundation (evidence · Government (linguistics · Political science · Process (computing · Public participation · Public relations · Sociology · Vision · Computer Science · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Law · Place Attachment and Urban Studies · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology
Loft living
Planning with Complexity
The Evolution of Public Participation GIS
Use of Information Technology for Community Empowerment
Negotiating Knowledge Production
Empowerment, Marginalization, and "Community-integrated" GIS
Information in Communicative Planning
Reframing public participation
Cultural Planning and Urban Renewal in South Africa
Current directions in cultural planning
Cultural Planning
New Creative Community
Cultural Planning in Australia
Cultural development and city neighborhoods
Six Communication and the Other
Visualization Tools and Methods for Participatory Planning and Design
Arts and Culture in Urban or Regional Planning
Power, Participation, and Inflexible Institutions
Cultural Development Strategies and Urban Revitalization
Cultural planning in Ontario, Canada
Civic Gold” Rush
Beyond Bilbao
Gis and Spatial Knowledge Production for Neighborhood Revitalization
Incorporating Policy Criteria in Spatial Analysis
Scale and the limitations of ontological debate
The Question of Participation
Human Factors in Adoption of Geographic Information Systems
Narrative policy analysis and the integration of public involvement in decision making
Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise
Pro scale
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
The Use of Geographic Information Systems in Local Government
The Democratization of the Policy Sciences
GIS, Public Service, and the Issue of Democratic Governance
Citizen Participation in Decision Making
A "Smarter, Better, Faster, and Cheaper" Government
Assessing the Effects of Public Participation
Examining Citizen Participation
Managing the Unmanageable
Depoliticising development
The Scale Politics of Spaliality
GIS Use in Community Planning
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |