Right to Safety? Declaration or Not, It Is Time for Action
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12440434 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adnan A Hyder (0000-0002-7292-577X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 179-179 |
| Publication date | 2003-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health and Human Rights (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1079-0969 • E-ISSN: 2150-4113 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/4065439 |
| OpenAlex | W2487859023 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
he Montreal Declaration is a welcome addition to the set of declarations that have emerged recently from the health field.' And yet, in many respects, it appears to be different from its counterparts: It addresses an area of health that has been relatively neglected in global decisions; it emerges from a developing country orientation; and it is the product of a largely technical audience with wider consultations. Although these features make the Declaration somewhat unique, it needs to be analyzed for its ethical and public health rationale, as well as for its content with special regard to the actions needed for people in low- and middleincome countries
Action (physics · Declaration · Human rights · Political science · Ethics in medical practice · Health and Conflict Studies · Human Rights and Development · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |