The Gospel of Thomas (Pynchon)
Abandoning Eschatology in Gravity’s Rainbow
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12445100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J R Pederson (0000-0001-9424-5372, Marymount Manhattan College, corresponding author), Joshua Pederson (1Marymount Manhattan College) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 139-160 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religion and the Arts (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1079-9265 • E-ISSN: 1568-5292 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/107992610x12592913031865 |
| OpenAlex | W1967597508 |
| Language | EN |
It is tempting to read Thomas Pynchon’s sprawling masterpiece Gravity’s Rainbow—with its shell-shocked refugees fleeing across a missile-pocked, post-war landscape—as an eschatological text that plays out religious end-times scenarios. However, an invented citation from the non-canonical Gospel of Thomas included as a chapter epigraph—“Dear Mom, I put a couple of people in hell today”—suggests that we should do otherwise. In grafting a playful fragment about Jesus, judgment, and hell onto Thomas, Pynchon parodies a common need to read eschatological themes back into non-eschatological texts. In doing so, he also provides a powerful heuristic for interpreting his own book. Ultimately, Pynchon’s own rocket-gospel is likewise a non-eschatological text. Like Thomas, Gravity’s Rainbow stymies readers’ efforts to derive a clear eschatology from it—or to read one back into it. In this essay, I contend that Pynchon enacts a number of strategies to keep his audience from reading classic end-times scenarios into his own work, all of which are prefigured by the Gospel of Thomas
Art · Art history · Eschatology · Gospel · Literature · Physics · Rainbow · Theology · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Literature and Cultural Memory · Philosophy · Themes in Literature Analysis
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |