Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Marriage choices, social homogamy and modernization in Milan, 1890-1899 and 1950-1959

Bibliographic Data

ID12447486
AuthorsGiulia Corti (0000-0002-2287-2307, University of Trento, corresponding author), Maurizio Pisati (0000-0002-1517-8472, Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy)
Year2021
Volume26
Issue3
Pages353-376
Publication date2021-03-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe History of the Family (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1081-602X • E-ISSN: 1873-5398
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1081602x.2021.1888767
OpenAlexW3134395177
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited33

Marriage patterns are a key element in the social reproduction of inequalities because, through marriage, socio-economic resources are distributed among individuals and households. Furthermore, the measure by which individuals from different groups marry each other can be considered as an indicator of the grade of openness of a society. From a historical perspective, modernization theory has traditionally predicted a decrease in marital homogamy by social origin. Long-term trends in social homogamy have been investigated in the social history field, and empirical evidence is quite diverse across contexts and periods. We analyzed patterns of social homogamy in Milan using new couple-level data on marriages between the end of the 19th and the first half of the 20th century. Following the modernization framework, we hypothesized that the transition towards an industrial society should be accompanied by an increase in social heterogamy. Results show that, net of changing marginal distributions across social classes, patterns of couple formation remain substantively the same across time. Men appear less mobile than women, who have a higher tendency towards upward marital mobility. As for intermarriage among social classes, boundaries between the top and bottom classes, and barriers between manual and non-manual workers remained strong across time. These results, as previously found in other contexts, do not fully corroborate the modernization theory

Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economics · Inequality · Life course approach · Modernization theory · Openness to experience · Social change · Social inequality · Social mobility · Social science · Sociology · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Bibliography of urban history 2022

    Open Access•Andrew McTominey•Urban History•2022

  • World Revolution and Family Patterns.

    Goode Goode•World Revolution and Family…•1970

  • Mobility Tables

    M Hout•Mobility tables•1983

  • Understanding the gender gap

    Claudia Dale Goldin•Understanding the gender gap•1992

  • Woman's Role in Economic Development

    Ester Boserup, Su Fei Tan et al.•Woman's Role in Economic…•2013

  • Partner choice in the Netherlands, 1813–1922

    Open Access•Ineke Maas, Marco H D Van Leeuwen•The History of the Family•2019

  • Women in a changing economy

    Maria Stanfors•The History of the Family•2014

  • When women disappear from the labour market

    Wiebke Schulz, Ineke Maas et al.•The History of the Family•2014

  • A historical community approach to social homogamy in the past

    Open Access•Marco H D Van Leeuwen, Ineke Maas•The History of the Family•2019

  • Assortative mating by occupational status during early industrialization

    Open Access•Richard L Zijdeman, Richard Zijdeman et al.•Research in Social Stratification…•2010

  • Bridegrooms and Biases

    Henk Delger, H E Delger et al.•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1998

  • Creating a Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations An Exercise in Multinational Interdisciplinary Cooperation

    Marco H D Van Leeuwen, Ineke Maas et al.•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2004

  • The Rise and Decline of the Male Breadwinner Family? An Overview of the Debate

    Open Access•Angélique Janssens, A A P O Janssens•International Review of Social…•1997

  • Total and Relative Endogamy by Social Origin

    Open Access•Ineke Maas, Marco H D Van Leeuwen•International Review of Social…•2005

  • Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating

    Christine R Schwartz•Annual Review of Sociology•2013

  • The American occupational structure

    Peter Michael Blau•The American occupational structure•1978

  • Homogamy by Geographical Origin

    Open Access•Bart Van De Putte•Journal of Family History•2003

  • Heterogeneity and Intermarriage

    Peter M Blau, T C Blum et al.•American Sociological Review•1982

  • Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating

    Robert D Mare•American Sociological Review•1991

  • Two Kinds of Preindustrial Household Formation System

    John Hajnal•Population and Development Review•1982

  • More or Less Educational Homogamy? A Test of Different Versions of Modernization Theory Using Cross-Temporal Evidence for 60 Countries

    Jeroen Smits, Wout Ultee et al.•American Sociological Review•2000

  • Migration and the 'Miracle' at Milan. The Neighbourhoods of Baggio, Barona, Bovisa and Comasina in the 1950s and 1960s

    Open Access•John Foot•Journal of Historical Sociology•1997

  • Women's Work and Economic Development

    Open Access•Kristin Mammen, Christina Paxson•The Journal of Economic…•2000

  • The impact of parental death on the timing of first marriage

    Open Access•Matthias Rosenbaum-Feldbrügge, Matthias Rosenbaum‐feldbrügge et al.•Demographic Research•2019

  • Health and socio-demographic conditions as determinants of marriage and social mobility

    Open Access•Marco Breschi, Matteo Manfredini et al.•Demographic Research•2010

  • Intermarriage and Homogamy

    M Kalmijn•Annual Review of Sociology•1998

  • Educational Assortative Marriage in Comparative Perspective

    Hans-Peter Blossfeld•Annual Review of Sociology•2009

  • Industrialization and Social Stratification

    Open Access•Donald J Treiman•Sociological Inquiry•1970

  • Status Homogamy in the United States

    M Kalmijn•American Journal of Sociology•1991

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae