Shameless”
Augustine, After Augustine, and Way After Augustine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12448224 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven Justice (University of Mississippi, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 17-43 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1082-9636 • E-ISSN: 1527-8263 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/10829636-2389479 |
| OpenAlex | W2324059123 |
| Language | EN |
The pejorative “shameless,” applied liberally to religious and intellectual antagonists until quite recently, now has a distinct period feel, and has frequently and casually been taken to justify diagnosing those who use it as “anxious.” The essay shows that the accusation of shamelessness has a precise and fairly stable sense from antiquity through the Enlightenment; that this sense differs materially from what modern readers and scholars typically suppose it to be; that the accusation persists now, though under a different verbal formula; and that its persistence is unsurprising, because the possibility of making such an accusation is virtually a necessity of reasoned discourse
Enlightenment · Epistemology · False accusation · Linguistics · Pejorative · Theology · Augustinian Studies and Theology · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |