Who Owns the Hebrew Doctors? Oriental Scholarship, Historical Proportionality, and the Puritan “Invention” of Avant-Garde Conformity

Puritan and conformist divines both sought to “own the Hebrew doctors” just as they had appealed to patristic sources in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. The puritan Walter Travers drew upon the rabbinic commentary of Abraham Ibn Ezra to argue for the refashioning of the church in the 1570s. Elizabethan ecclesiastical controversy in turn helped “invent” central features of avant-garde conformity by prompting Richard Hooker's use of Jewish precedent to stabilize the church from the 1580s onward. Mutual claims to the Hebrew doctors exposed disagreement over how to proportion the New Testament church in relation to layered Jewish tradition. Yet, by the early seventeenth century, the separatist Henry Ainsworth began to make more extensive, even promiscuous, use of Maimonides. This signaled movement away from simply attempting to “own the Hebrew doctors” to conscripting Jewish authorities as more active, and less mediated, participants in early modern debate

Art · Conformist · Conformity · Consolation · Haskalah · Hebrew · Jewish literature · Jewish studies · Judaism · Literature · Old Testament · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

• Reorienting English Protestantism

  Polly Ha•Journal of Medieval and Early…•2023

  Add to list

• From Rabbis and Millenarians to High Church Orthodoxy

  Thomas Roebuck•Journal of Medieval and Early…•2023

  Add to list