German "Minor" Thinkers
The Perception of Moser's and Justi's Works in an Enlightened European Context
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12450164 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan Richter (0000-0001-5871-7264, a Ruprecht-Karls-University/Heidelberg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 51-72 |
| Publication date | 2014-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Administrative Theory & Praxis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1084-1806 • E-ISSN: 1949-0461 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2753/atp1084-1806360104 |
| OpenAlex | W2265834795 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
German theoreticians of administration in the eighteenth century were not acknowledged in the English or French discourse on administrative reform because they published in German, and thus their approaches to cameralism went unnoticed in England and France. The situation was quite different for the European periphery: Works by Johann Heinrich Gottlob Justi and Friedrich Carl von Moser were widely read in Russia because German was its second official language and in Spain because of the growing interest in administration (and in the education of administrative personnel) in the territories of the Holy Roman Empire. Thanks to government-initiated translations, cameralism experienced a widely acclaimed reception
Administration (probate law · Archaeology · Economic history · Empire · German · German government · Government (linguistics · Linguistics · Minor (academic · Political science · Roman Empire · Classics · Historical Economic and Legal Thought · History · Law · Law and Political Science · Philosophy · Public Administration · Public Administration and Political Analysis
| Highly cited | No |
|---|