The Study of Administration and the Persistence of the Legitimacy Question
An Essay on a Concept
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12450402 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sara R Jordan (Texas A&M University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 631-641 |
| Publication date | 2006-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Administrative Theory & Praxis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1084-1806 • E-ISSN: 1949-0461 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10841806.2006.11029559 |
| OpenAlex | W2297822891 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 8 |
Concepts, such as legitimacy, continue to be critical parts of the normative and empirical study of public administration. Yet, they are often under-defined either with respect to present scholarship or the scholarship of the past. In this brief essay, I offer an analysis of the importance of conceptual clarity for this generation of public administration scholars, as well as an analysis of the components of conceptual inquiry, using the concept of legitimacy as an example
Administration (probate law · CLARITY · Critical appraisal · Epistemology · Legitimacy · Normative · Persistence (discontinuity · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
The structure of scientific revolutions
Public Administration as The Carrier of the new Social Bond
Reclaiming John Dewey
Postmodernism and American Public Administration in the 1990s
The Big Questions of Public Administration Education
The Doctorate in Public Administration
Metaphor and Political Knowledge
Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2023 (10) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |