Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative Public Administration

Navigating Scylla and Charybdis - Global Comparison as a Translation Problem

Bibliographic Data

ID12450826
AuthorsMark R Rutgers (Leiden University, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume26
Issue2
Pages150-168
Publication date2004-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAdministrative Theory & Praxis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1084-1806 • E-ISSN: 1949-0461
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10841806.2004.11029435
OpenAlexW2271277829
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited6

Comparative research has to transcend differences in culture and language. We cannot simply define our own concepts and variables as the objects of comparison are socially constructed. It is therefore imperative to account for translation problems within the theory on comparative research. Theoretically we can distinguish between two ways of accomplishing a relevant comparison: by means of capturing the authentic or local meaning of social reality, or by applying our own concepts as a yardstick or meaning gauge. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. Researchers, however, somehow have to navigate between the two in order to secure the meaning of the comparisons made. Especially if we want to apply in practice what we perceive as desirable in another country, we must be careful with and accountable for the interpretations and translations involved

Business · Epistemology · Meaning (existential · Order (exchange · Political science · Sociology · Yardstick · Computer Science · European Union Policy and Governance · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Systems and Governance · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • The dialogue between Kant and Weber

    Open Access•Danilo Pupavac•Sociologija•2024

  • The History of Ideas and Normative Research in Public Administration

    Michael W Spicer•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2008

  • The “Good Official” as a Confucian Sage

    Lijing Yang•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2019

  • Public Administration Enquiry and Social Science in The Postmodern Condition

    Michael W Spicer•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2005

  • Disciplinary Tensions and Institutional Diversity in the Study of Public Administration in Chile

    Open Access•Nicolas Didier, Juan Pablo Araya‐Orellana•Public Administration Review•2026

  • Public–Private Partnership in Poland

    Open Access•Frans Jorna, Pieter Wagenaar et al.•Administration & Society•2010

  • How Pro‐social Motivation Affects Job Satisfaction

    Open Access•Anne Mette Kjeldsen, Lotte Bøgh Andersen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2013

  • Without Blinders

    Open Access•G De Graaf, Zeger Van Der Wal•Public Integrity•2017

  • Socio-Translational Collaboration in Qualitative Inquiry

    Open Access•Beate Littig, Franz Pöchhacker•Qualitative Inquiry•2014

  • Comparative methodology

    Else Oyen•Comparative methodology•1990

  • Semantic Indeterminacy and Scientific Underdetermination

    Open Access•Philip L Peterson•Philosophy of Science•1984

  • Politics and Social Science

    Bruce Hackett, W J M Mackenzie•American Sociological Review•1969

  • The Study of Administration

    Open Access•Woodrow Wilson•Political Science Quarterly•1887

  • The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy

    Peter Winch, Peter J Winch•Idea of a Social Science and Its…•2015

  • Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation

    Donald Davidson, Donald Herbert Davidson•Inquiries into truth and…•2001

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,43
Citation span2005 - 2026 (22)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae