Neuro-Gov

up, and go beyond! could be a slogan. Catch up to the neuroscientific revolution, and to those in political science, in econom ics, in philosophy and in psychology who have already turned to neuros cience! Yet in embracing neuroscience, go beyond the scope and methods of such traditional disciplines. By transcending scope, for in stance, I mean coverage of the full range of governance?the gamut of governing activities, dynamically interrelated, that includes not only public enterprise but also private enterprise, non-profits, self-governing, and the rest. I'll call this marriage of neuroscience and governance neuro-gov. Yet there are pitfalls. There can be failure to recognize that embrac ing neuroscience doesn't mean biological determinism?nor even that biology is trumps. Turning to neuroscience implies neither abandoning insights available from, say, Shakespeare nor divorcing multi-perspec tival play. On the contrary, the embrace requires its own multidisciplinarity. Neuroscience is itself a language, but with differing dialects. I started with the hard science dialect, prompted by wondering why my house mate was so interested. I began by buying a shiny $100 book (Baer, Connors, & Paradiso, 2007) from the medical campus bookstore. I liked the glossy pages, just as when a teenager I loved the glossy pages of Alfred Marshall's Principles of Economics. It was better than a novel. I heard myself exclaim Wow! every couple of pages. So, the brain is plastic, and?within limits?shaped by its environment (Baer et al

Cognitive science · Corporate governance · Management · Political science · Politics · Scope (computer science · Slogan · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

• Advancing the frontiers of genomic public administration

  Open Access•Lei Tao, Shui‐yan Tang et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  Add to list