Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Israel and International Law

The Indigenous Concept in Supreme Court Rulings

Bibliographic Data

ID12454071
AuthorsYahel Yahel (corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume26
Issue1
Pages172-172
Publication date2020-11-24
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIsrael Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1084-9513 • E-ISSN: 1527-201X
PublisherIndiana University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2979/israelstudies.26.1.09
OpenAlexW3108961435
LanguageEN

In 2007, a majority of UN member states adopted a declaration regarding the rights of indigenous people. The declaration acknowledged a series of indigenous rights but failed to provide a concrete definition of who is indigenous. As a result, the term remained vague, open to interpretation and manipulation, and led to confusion and controversy. In Israel mean-while the indigenous concept found a foothold in public discourse. The Israeli Supreme Court (ISC) first encountered the concept when Negev Bedouin citizens claimed indigenous land rights. Two years later, the ISC applied the same concept in a series of judgments regarding the status of the permanent residents of East Jerusalem. The article examines the way the international indigenous discourse has penetrated ISC rulings and analyzes the phenomenon in light of the judicial activism discourse

Confusion · Declaration · Indigenous · Interpretation (philosophy · Political science · Sociology · Supreme court · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · International Law and Human Rights · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae