Cutting the Gordian Knot on Highway Reauthorization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12456303 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert W Poole (0000-0001-9613-6401, Reason Foundation, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 219-222 |
| Publication date | 2004-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Works Management & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-724X • E-ISSN: 1552-7549 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1087724x03262837 |
| OpenAlex | W1988549914 |
| Language | EN |
The principal obstacle to reauthorizing the federal surface transportation program is a dispute over the size of the program and the amount, if any, of an increase in federal fuel taxes. A gap of $125 billion (over 6 years) separates the Bush Administration’s proposal from that of the House of Representatives, with the latter favoring a large fuel tax increase. This article suggests that a significant expansion of tolling and public-private partnership options for states could lead to $50 billion in net new investment over 6 years, whereas indexing of fuel taxes could add another $15 billion. If both anti-tax conservatives and the highway community could agree to such a compromise, America could achieve a much-needed increase in highway investment without a “tax increase” in the normal sense
Administration (probate law · Business · Compromise · Economics · Fuel tax · Investment (military · Knot (papermaking · Obstacle · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Revenue · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Engineering · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Law · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Finance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |