The Privatization of Commercial Airports in the United States
What Is Wrong with the Federal Aviation Administration Privatization Program, and What Might Be More Successful
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12456418 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Keith Mew (California State University Los Angeles, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 99-105 |
| Publication date | 2000-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Works Management & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-724X • E-ISSN: 1552-7549 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1087724x0052003 |
| OpenAlex | W2154533444 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This article summarizes current discussion regarding the privatization of U.S. airports in general and the Federal Aviation Administration airport privatization pilot program in particular. The lack of success of this program is analyzed in terms of general airline opposition to privatization and the inherent advantages to the airlines of the current airport financial system. Those advantages are primarily (a) the historic cost method of calculating landing fees and (b) the subsidization of the capital improvement program. Reference is made to other airport financial systems that may be more successful, such as the management of Indianapolis Airport by the British Airport Authority U.S., Inc
Administration (probate law · Aviation · Business · Economics · General aviation · Market economy · Opposition (politics · Political science · Subsidy · Transport engineering · Air Traffic Management and Optimization · Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends · Engineering · Transport and Economic Policies · Finance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|