Beyond a Two-Tier Service? Agency and Parent Experiences, Expectations, and Perspectives of Support in Intercountry Adoption in the United Kingdom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12460072 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katie Hoffman (Olathe Medical Center, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 227-246 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Adoption Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1092-6755 • E-ISSN: 1544-452X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10926755.2014.891548 |
| OpenAlex | W2051517705 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 10 |
For many years, intercountry adoption (ICA) in the United Kingdom was an unregulated, “tolerated” practice which was neither scrutinized nor supported to the degree of domestic adoption. Since 1999, legislative changes have sought to place ICA on equal footing with domestic adoption. This article addresses the extent to which this objective has been achieved through an examination of post-placement support practices and parents’ experiences, preferences, and expectations of support services. The findings of this study indicate that a less proactive, inclusive approach, limitations of professional knowledge and experience, the lack of appropriate services, and families’ support preferences contribute to the persistence of a “two-tier service.”
Agency (philosophy · Business · Family support · Legislature · Political science · Public relations · Service (business · Sociology · Child Welfare and Adoption · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Marketing
Costs and Outcomes of Non‐infant Adoptions
Successful Outcomes
New Parents for Older Children
Beyond a two-tier service? Preparation and assessment in intercountry adoption in the UK
Mediation and the Role of ‘Accredited Bodies’ in Intercountry Adoption
The Adoption and Children Act 2002
An evaluation of post-adoption services
| Citations per year | 0.22 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2018 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |