Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The name game”

Feminist protests of the DSM and diagnostic labels in the 1980s

Bibliographic Data

ID12460940
AuthorsJenifer Dodd (Vanderbilt University, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume18
Issue3
Pages312-323
Publication date2015-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1093-4510 • E-ISSN: 1939-0610
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/a0039520
PMID26375158
OpenAlexW2269944683
LanguageEN
Citations received5

This article examines protests of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in the mid-1980s to show how feminists working in mental health fields grappled with the tensions between their politics and their work. I argue that the DSM became a site where women attempted to tease out issues relating to gender, professionalization, and the power and stakes of labeling. Feminists privileged a sociological reading of gender, which butted up against mental health care workers' professional investment in psychiatric ones. Women's responses to the DSM, however, reveal that the line between the sociological and the pathological was unclear. This debate over labels is exemplified by a proposal to diagnose rapists as mentally ill. Women's advocates framed sexual assault as an issue of violence against women, rather than an issue of male sexuality. For many women, the American Psychiatric Association's proposal implied that rape was a primarily sexual act, and that male socialization needn't be examined. Others, however, saw this as one more way to label and address bad male behavior; psychiatric treatment might not ultimately put an end to rape, but these women saw any sort of treatment as a step forward. For women professionals, this proposal and the DSM more broadly raised questions about whether the 2 frameworks could be integrated, and whether psychological treatments for social problems were appropriate

Criminology · Human sexuality · Mental health · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Professionalization · Psychiatry · Social science · Socialization · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Gender Studies · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • What Is the Problem With Sexual Intimacy Following Intimate Partner Violence in the DSM -5

    Open Access•Alannah Buller, Sarah Epstein et al.•Violence Against Women•2021

  • Neuro-queering feminism

    Open Access•Jessica Fox•Feminism & Psychology•2025

  • A Post-Structural Feminist Analysis of Eating Disorders Intervention Research

    Open Access•Amina Hussain, Mishal Dar et al.•Affilia•2021

  • Structural Violence and the Effects of the Patriarchal Structure on the Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder (BDP)

    Open Access•Eva Valero, Elena Valero et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Psychologization in and through the women's movement

    Open Access•Nora Ruck, Vera Luckgei et al.•Journal of the History of the…•2022

Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae