Overcoming our mutual isolation

How historians and psychologists can work together

Bibliographic Data

ID12460965
AuthorsNadine Weidman (0000-0003-0894-5247, Harvard University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume19
Issue3
Pages248-253
Publication date2016-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1093-4510 • E-ISSN: 1939-0610
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/hop0000042
PMID27442034
OpenAlexW2507054572
LanguageEN
Citations received6

The history of psychology is one of those unusual academic fields pursued by two different groups of scholars in two different institutional locations: psychologist-historians and historians of science. In this concluding reflection on the special issue, I argue for a new kind of relationship between these two professional groups. Neither their consolidation nor their mutual isolation is the best way forward for our small and neglected field. Instead, I imagine a future in which the difference between our professional locations narrows but does not disappear, in which communication and mutual understanding broaden and intensify, but in which the two groups maintain their distinct identities. Because mutual isolation does not serve anyone's interests well, I discuss two ways in which further integration of the two groups might take shape. (PsycINFO Database Record

Cognitive psychology · Consolidation (business · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · History of psychology · Isolation (microbiology · MEDLINE · Mutual recognition · Political science · Psychological science · PsycINFO · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub