Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Enduring” Incivility

Sarah Palin and the Tucson Tragedy

Bibliographic Data

ID12464962
AuthorsBeth L Boser (corresponding author), Randall A Lake
Year2014
Volume17
Issue4
Pages619-652
Publication date2014-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRhetoric and Public Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1094-8392 • E-ISSN: 1534-5238
PublisherMichigan State University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.14321/rhetpublaffa.17.4.0619
OpenAlexW268272485
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited8

In the immediate aftermath of the Tucson, Arizona, shootings in 2011, controversy erupted over the role, if any, that Tea Party rhetoric had played in inciting Jared Lee Loughner’s rampage. Especially controversial was Sarah Palin’s video, “America’s Enduring Strength,” which denied that this rhetoric was responsible and, in fact, celebrated it as quintessential free speech. This essay makes two related arguments. First, although context encourages audiences to expect political self-defense, Palin’s video is neither deliberative nor forensic but epideictic: a celebration of abstract values so severed from circumstances that Palin et al. become heroically, purely virtuous, while those who dare raise the question of responsibility that is central to deliberation (“who, or what, is to blame, and what, then, is to be done?”) become vicious. However, this move is obscured because Palin’s version of free speech simultaneously inhabits the prevailing, and limited, social and legal understanding of the First Amendment. Hence, we also argue that a consequentialist framework for free expression is less suited to revealing the video’s troubling rhetoric of free speech than is a constitutive framework, such as has been proffered by some scholars of hate speech. To the extent that the consequentialist framework dominates constitutional jurisprudence and public understanding, however, “America’s Enduring Strength” also manifests America’s enduring problem in coming to grips with Tucson and other mass shootings

Blame · Context (archaeology · Criminology · Deliberation · Incivility · Jurisprudence · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · Tragedy (event · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · History · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Uncivil Name‐Calling in the U.S. Presidency, 1933–2018

    Open Access•Kevin Coe, Dakota Park-Ozee et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Out of Chaos Breathes Creation”

    Francesca Marie Smith, Thomas A Hollihan•Rhetoric and Public Affairs•2014

  • Multimodal rhetorics in the gun debate

    Gabriela Tscholl•Communication and Democracy•2024

  • Feminism unmodified

    Catharine A Mackinnon•Feminism unmodified•1987

  • A Grammar of Motives

    Kenneth Burke•Grammar of Motives•2023

  • Toward Robust Public Engagement

    Don Waisanen•Rhetoric and Public Affairs•2014

  • Evil Enemy Versus Agonistic Other

    Robert L Ivie•The Review of Education Pedagogy…•2003

  • Political apologia

    Ellen Reid Gold•Communication Monographs•1978

  • The rhetoric of confrontation

    Robert L Scott, Donald K Smith•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1969

  • Creative casuistry and feminist consciousness

    Ann Carlson, A Cheree Carlson•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1992

  • They spoke in defense of themselves

    Ben Ware, B L Ware et al.•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1973

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2014 - 2024 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae