Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Between Love and Stigma

A Vignette-Based Study of Monogamous Bias and Gender-Related Perceptions in Romantic Relationships

Bibliographic Data

ID12466377
AuthorsSébastien Paganelli (0009-0006-4695-5015, University of Parma, corresponding author), Chiara Imperato (0000-0002-4787-0631, University of Parma), Tiziana Mancini (0000-0001-7173-6478, University of Parma)
Year2025
Publication date2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSexuality & Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1095-5143 • E-ISSN: 1936-4822
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s12119-025-10495-1
OpenAlexW4416868543
LanguageEN
References cited32

Nowadays, an increasing number of people are opting for alternative forms of Consensual Non-Monogamy (CNM), an umbrella term which includes all the different kinds of relationships where all the people involved have chosen by common accord to have more than a single romantic partner. Since this relational arrangement challenges mononormativity (i.e., the assumption that monogamy is healthier or more natural), the present study explored whether and to what extent monogamous and non-monogamous individuals share monogamous bias. Additionally, we examined whether participants perceived women in CNM relationships in a more stereotypical way compared to those in a monogamous relation. We conducted an online vignette study in which participants were randomly assigned to read either a vignette depicting a monogamous relationship or a vignette depicting a CNM relationship. The total sample consisted of 224 participants aged 19 to 69 years ( M = 27.27, SD = 7.11; n monogamous = 127, 56.7%; n CNM = 97, 43.3%). Overall, the results showed that non-monogamous participants exhibited higher levels of monogamous bias, perceiving the vignette depicting a CNM relationship as lower in quality, less acceptable, and less sexually satisfying compared to monogamous respondents. Furthermore, our results showed that non-monogamous women exposed to the non-monogamous vignette perceived the women partner as more committed than participants in any other condition. These findings highlight the pervasive influence of mononormativity even among non-monogamous individuals and challenge the persistence of stereotypical views about women in CNM relationships, emphasizing the need for further research on the interplay between relationship arrangement and prejudices

Perception · Romance · Sample (material · Sexual behavior · Social perception · Vignette · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Marriage and Sexual Relationships

  • Why Men (and Women) Do and Don’t Rebel

    Open Access•John T Jost, Vagelis Chaikalis-Petritsis et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2012

  • Self and Social Identity

    Naomi Ellemers, Russell Spears et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2002

  • Beyond the Norm of Monogamy – Consensual Non-monogamy as an Example of a ‘Post-modern’ Relationship

    Open Access•Magdalena Lipnicka•Studia Socjologiczne•2023

  • Theorizing multi-partner relationships and sexualities – Recent work on non-monogamy and polyamory

    Open Access•C Klesse•Sexualities•2018

  • A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct

    Robert B Cialdini, Carl A Kallgren et al.•Advances in Experimental Social…•1991

  • Social Dominance

    Open Access•Jim Sidanius, Felicia Pratto•Social Dominance•1999

  • The Fewer the Merrier

    Open Access•Terri D Conley, Amy C Moors et al.•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2012

  • Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory

    Open Access•Meg Barker, D Langdridge•Sexualities•2010

  • Sexual double standards

    Mary Crawford, Danielle Popp•The Journal of Sex Research•2003

  • Three’s a crowd

    Kevin T Hutzler, Traci A Giuliano et al.•Psychology and Sexuality•2015

  • Fifty Shades of Sexual Health and BDSM Identity Messaging

    Open Access•Christine E Leistner, Kristen P Mark•Sexuality & Culture•2016

  • Confirmation Bias and the Sexual Double Standard

    Open Access•Michael J Marks, R Chris Fraley•Sex Roles•2006

  • Traditional Gender Ideology, Work Family Conflict, and Marital Quality among Chinese Dual-Earner Couples

    Open Access•Xiaomin Li, H Cao et al.•Sex Roles•2020

  • Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism

    Open Access•John Turner, J C Turner et al.•European Journal of Social…•1979

  • Confronting Sexual Stigma and Prejudice

    Open Access•Gregory M Herek•Journal of Social Issues•2007

  • From Fantasy to Reality

    Open Access•Claire Kimberly, J D Hans•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2017

  • Examining the Role of Mononormative Beliefs, Stigma, and Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity for Dehumanization

    Open Access•D Rodrigues, Thomas R Brooks et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2024

  • Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships

    Open Access•Justin Mogilski, Pau Viciano Navarro et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2019

  • Stigma

    Arjan E R Bos, John B Pryor et al.•Basic and Applied Social Psychology•2013

  • The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness

    Open Access•John T Jost, Mahzarin R Banaji•British Journal of Social…•1994

  • Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations

    Ilan H Meyer•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • Stigma and prejudice

    Open Access•Jo C Phelan, Jo Phelan et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  • Characteristics of Relationship Agreements and Associations with Relationship Functioning Among People with Diverse Relationship Structures

    Open Access•Ellora Vilkin, Joanne Davila•Journal of Social and Personal…•2023

  • Drawing the line at infidelity

    Open Access•Catrine Andersson•Journal of Social and Personal…•2022

  • Alternative Lifestyles Revisited, or Whatever Happened to Swingers, Group Marriages, and Communes

    Open Access•Roger H Rubin•Journal of Family Issues•2001

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae