Nice” to “ewww”
An Inductive Thematic Analysis of Responses to Initiation Messages Containing Sexual Content on Online Dating Tools
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12466979 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amanda E Lilly (0000-0003-1421-5937, Utah State University, corresponding author), Alana Haupert (Utah State University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 2508-2529 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sexuality & Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1095-5143 • E-ISSN: 1936-4822 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12119-026-10555-0 |
| OpenAlex | W7133516670 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 57 |
As online dating transforms modern courtship, sexually explicit initiation messages have become increasingly prevalent. This study examines how online daters respond to such messages, using sexual scripts theory and a feminist lens to explore how gendered norms and power dynamics shape online courtship and sociosexual norms. A total of 157 participants were surveyed about their potential responses to receiving a sexually explicit initiation message on an online dating platform. Inductive thematic analysis revealed four primary response themes: avoidance, acceptance, rejection, and power reclamation. Findings show that most recipients, especially women, preferred avoidance or rejection. Some men were more likely to accept explicit messages, particularly when the sender was perceived as attractive, highlighting conditional acceptance norms. Additionally, a minority of participants actively challenged or reclaimed power in their responses, signaling resistance to digital sexual harassment. These results underscore how sexual scripts shape perceptions of consent, agency, and desirability in online dating for both men and women. By examining these gendered dynamics, this study contributes to broader discussions on digital intimacy, sexual communication norms, and the evolving sociosexual landscape of online courtship
Communication source · Content analysis · Courtship · Perception · Power (physics · Scripting language · Sexual attraction · Thematic analysis · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Sexual Violence in a Digital Age
Sexual Conduct
An Exploration of the Involuntary Celibate (Incel) Subculture Online
Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS)
Sexual Hookup Culture
Consensual qualitative research
The gamification of dating online
Repercussions of Rejecting Unwanted Advances
Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence
Hard won and easily lost
Cyber relationship motives
Dick pics on blast
Hook-Up Culture
Simply more than swiping left
Postfeminist media culture
Online daters' reactions to sexually explicit initiation messages
Scripting Sex in Courtship
Directly in Your Face’
The dating game
Bad Girls” Say No and “Good Girls” Say Yes
The Three Dimensions of Unsolicited Dick Pics
Technologies of Sexiness
I can be your Tinder nightmare”
The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy Is Associated With Patriarchy Endorsement
Unsolicited dick pics
From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships
A New Standard of Sexual Behavior? Are Claims Associated With the “Hookup Culture” Supported by General Social Survey Data
I’ll Show You Mine so You’ll Show Me Yours
Women’s and Men’s Reactions to Receiving Unsolicited Genital Images from Men
Sexual scripts
Predictors and Consequences of Sexual “Hookups” Among College Students
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The Online Disinhibition Effect
Distinguishing technologies for social interaction
Humor as a Double-Edged Sword
Online Dating and Mating
C'mon, No One Wants a Dick Pic
At First Sight
Sorry, I already have a boyfriend
Mediated Superficiality and Misogyny Through Cool on Tinder
The Dick Pic
Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy
Alphas, Betas, and Incels
Hegemonic Masculinity
Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication
"Where Have All the Good Men Gone?" Gendered Interactions in Online Dating
Guilty Pleasure? Communicating Sexually Explicit Content on Dating Apps and Disillusionment with App Usage
A double standard for 'Hooking Up
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |