Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intermarriage and Segmented Assimilation

U.S.-Born Asians in 2000

Bibliographic Data

ID12469765
AuthorsXuanning Fu (corresponding author), Melanie E Hatfield
Year2008
Volume11
Issue3
Pages249-277
Publication date2008-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Asian American Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1096-8598 • E-ISSN: 1097-2129
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/jaas.0.0018
OpenAlexW2045332431
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited23

Intermarriage and Segmented AssimilationU.S.-Born Asians in 2000 Xuanning Fu (bio) and Melanie E. Hatfield (bio) Hispanics and asians have become the two fastest growing segments of the U.S. population, largely due to influxes of immigration in the last few decades.1 How Hispanics and Asians assimilate into American society has been of interest to sociologists.2 In this study, we examine U.S.-born Asian Americans' assimilation through intermarriage, based on assumptions of Portes and Zhou's segmented assimilation theory.3 The 2000 census 5% PUMS data will be used for the analysis. Immigration and Asian Americans Immigration to the U.S. has had a clear pattern of four waves,4 generally referred to as the colonization wave (1600–1820), the frontier expansion wave (1820–1870), the industrialization wave (1880–1925), and the globalization wave (1965–present). Associated with these waves are the changing patterns of national origins and racial backgrounds of the immigrants.5 Primarily, the first three waves brought immigrants from different regions of Europe, with small proportions from Latin America and Asia.6 The fourth wave, conversely, largely saw immigrants coming from Mexico, Latin America, Asia and the Pacific Islands.7 The proportions of Asians in the total U.S. population have increased by 1% each decade since 1970, from 1% to 4% in 2000, while their actual [End Page 249] number rose from 1.5 million to 12 million during the same period.8 With continued immigration, Hispanics and Asians are expected to triple their share in the U.S. population to 25% by 2050,9 and their presence has already changed the racial and ethnic profiles of America from the traditionally dominant "Black-White" to a multi-layered diversity. Although Hispanics outnumber Asians by a large margin, Asians are much more diverse in national origins, native languages, religions, and cultural traditions. Asians also have a wider difference between themselves in length of residency in America, with some groups starting to arrive in large numbers 150 years ago and others only after 1965. Although they are all lumped together as "Asians" in the U.S. census, differences between various Asian groups can be just as large as between Asians and other racial groups. Socio-economically, new immigrants generally have lower educational attainment than native-born Americans, and they are also more likely to be employed in manual-labor occupations, especially among those who have fewer than 4 years of college.10 Different from this national norm, a large proportion of Asian immigrants are highly skilled and highly educated.11 Asian immigrants are therefore more evenly spread across all social strata, from highly skilled professionals to poorly educated manual laborers. In contrast, Hispanic immigrants tend to concentrate in the secondary labor market.12 Among the various Asian groups, Southeast Asians (Hmongs and Vietnamese, for example) tend to have the lowest socioeconomic status while Indians have the highest, although both are relatively new to America.13 The earliest Asian immigrant group, the Chinese, found their new immigrants spreading over a wide spectrum of socioeconomic status, with some being highly educated and skilled and others very poorly educated and non-skilled. In contrast, the Japanese, another early Asian immigrant group, have the smallest proportion of new immigrants and are perhaps the most acculturated Asians.14 Asian immigrants are thus very diverse in their educational and occupational profiles, and in their degrees of ethnic solidarity and adherence to enclave economy. These diversities, in turn, may lead to different versions of realizing the "American dream," and to various manifestations of assimilation to America through generations.15 [End Page 250] Intermarriage and Segmented Assimilation After landing in the host country, immigrants typically go through economic and socio-cultural incorporations, albeit with varying degrees of success. Gordon's classic assimilation model, which was built upon earlier work by M. L. Hansen, Robert Park, and others, posited a straight-line assimilation path through cultural, structural, and finally marital assimilations. Immigrants are hypothesized to acculturate into America, structurally merge into the middle-class society, and marry other Americans to eventually complete their assimilation process.16 While Gordon's model to a large degree could apply to European immigrants of the last

Archaeology · Asian americans · Census · Emigration · Ethnic group · Foreign born · Frontier · Geography · Immigration · Latin Americans · Political science · Population · Sociology · Demography · History · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • Learning about Race

    Open Access•Sarah Adeyinka-Skold, Dorothy E Roberts•Sociology of Race and Ethnicity•2019

  • Half and Half

    Stephanie L Young•Journal of International and…•2009

  • Patterns of Interracial and Interethnic Marriages among Foreign-Born Asians in the United States

    Open Access•P Q Yang, Maggie Bohm-Jordan•Societies•2018

  • The role of religion in integration through intermarriage

    Open Access•Natalie Stetler, Prakash Adhikari et al.•Politics and Religion•2026

  • Immigration and Political Incorporation

    Open Access•Michael R Kistner, Tanika Raychaudhuri•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2025

  • Intergenerational Assimilation by Intermarriage

    Margaret Gonsoulin, Xuanning Fu•Marriage & Family Review•2010

  • Asianness' under Construction

    Open Access•Kelly H Chong•Sociological Perspectives•2017

  • Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries

    Open Access•Charlie V Morgan•Journal of Family Issues•2015

  • The Model Man

    Open Access•Kelly H Chong, Nadia Y Kim•Men and Masculinities•2022

  • Children of immigrants

    Maurice Anyawie, D T Lichter•Population Studies•2023

  • Marriage patterns among Jewish immigrants in Israel

    Dennis Rosenberg, Alisa C Lewin•New Community•2022

  • Racially Informed Ethnic Heterogeneity in Asian American Intermarriage and Assimilation

    Open Access•Jess Lee•Sociology of Race and Ethnicity•2025

  • Intermarriage among new immigrants in the USA

    Pratikshya Bohra-Mishra, D S Massey•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2015

  • Occupational prestige in comparative perspective

    Donald J Treiman•Occupational prestige in…•1977

  • Mixed Blood

    Paul Spickard•Mixed Blood•1989

  • Interracialism

    Werner Sollors•Interracialism•2000

  • Immigrant America

    A Portes, Rubén G Rumbaut et al.•Immigrant America•2006

  • Love and Money

    R Fernandez, Nezih Guner et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2005

  • Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration

    Open Access•R Alba, Nee et al.•International Migration Review•1997

  • Asian American Interracial and Interethnic Marriages

    Open Access•Z Qian, L Blair et al.•International Migration Review•2001

  • Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003

    Open Access•Christine R Schwartz, Robert D Mare•Demography•2005

  • The New Second Generation

    Open Access•A Portes, Min Zhou•The Annals of the American…•1993

  • Temporal and Regional Variation in the Strength of Educational Homogamy

    Open Access•James M Raymo, Yu Xie•American Sociological Review•2000

  • The American Class Structure

    Florence Karlstrom, Dennis Gilbert et al.•Teaching Sociology•1988

  • Religious Group Characteristics, Endogamy, and Interfaith Marriages

    T B Heaton•Sociological Analysis•1990

  • Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating

    Robert D Mare•American Sociological Review•1991

  • Who Intermarries? Education, Nativity, Region, and Interracial Marriage, 1980 and 1990

    Z Qian•Journal of Comparative Family…•1999

  • Status Exchange in Intermarriage Among Hawaiians, Japanese, Filipinos and Caucasians in Hawaii

    Xuanning Fu, T B Heaton•Journal of Comparative Family…•2000

  • Structural and Assimilationist Explanations of Asian American Intermarriage

    Sean-Shong Hwang, Rogelio Sáenz et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1997

  • Marriage Choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969-71 and 1979-81

    Robert Schoen, John Wooldredge•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1989

  • Trends in Asian American Racial/Ethnic Intermarriage

    Open Access•Sharon M Lee, Marilyn Fernandez•Sociological Perspectives•1998

  • Intermarriage in Caste Societies1

    Open Access•Kingsley Davis•American Anthropologist•1941

  • Measures of Assimilation in the Marriage Market

    Open Access•M J Rosenfeld•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2002

  • A Critique of Exchange Theory in Mate Selection

    M J Rosenfeld•American Journal of Sociology•2005

Unique citing works13
Citations per year0,76
Citation span2009 - 2026 (18)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae