Evaluator Responsiveness to Stakeholders
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12470613 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tarek Azzam (0000-0003-3864-0217, Claremont Graduate University, California,, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2010 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 45-65 |
| Data de publicação | 2010-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | American Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214009354917 |
| OpenAlex | W1971265784 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 17 |
| Referências citadas | 13 |
A simulation study was conducted in an attempt to examine how evaluators modify their evaluation design in response to differing stakeholder groups. In this study, evaluators were provided with a fictitious description of a school-based program. They were then asked to design an evaluation of the program. After the evaluation design decisions were made, evaluators were presented with feedback from three differing stakeholder groups (i.e., decision maker, implementer, recipient) either endorsing or rejecting the evaluation design. Evaluators were then given the opportunity to modify (or not modify) their original design in response to stakeholder feedback. The findings revealed that the more political power or influence stakeholder groups held over evaluation logistical factors (i.e., funding, data access), the more evaluators were willing to modify their design choices to accommodate perceived stakeholder concerns. These design modifications were typically implemented to ensure data access, reduce stakeholder resistance, and increase stakeholder buy-in
Business · Knowledge management · Management science · Political science · Process management · Program Design Language · Program evaluation · Public relations · Research design · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder analysis · Applied Psychology · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
The role of titles in enhancing data visualization
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Logic Models
Indicators of buy-in to gauge evaluation success
Explaining the political use of evaluation in international organizations
Strengthening the rigour of population-wide, community-based obesity prevention evaluations
The politics of evaluation in international organizations
The State of the Empirical Research Literature on Stakeholder Involvement in Program Evaluation
Politics and Evaluation
A Decade of Research on Evaluation
The Good, the Bad, and the Evaluator
Bayesian Posterior Odds Ratios
Findings From an Empirical Exploration of Evaluators’ Values
Does Research on Evaluation Matter? Findings From a Survey of American Evaluation Association Members and Prominent Evaluation Theorists and Scholars
The Nature and Frequency of Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Program Evaluation
Evaluator Characteristics and Methodological Choice
The challenges in integrating horizontal perspectives in sectoral policy evaluation
Institutional design and biases in evaluation reports by international organizations
Randomized Experiments for Planning and Evaluation
What Guides Evaluation? A Study of How Evaluation Practice Maps onto Evaluation Theory
Commentary
Does the Superintendent's Opinion Affect School Boards' Evaluation Information Needs
The Credibility of a Local Educational Program Evaluation Report
The theory of decision making
The politics of program evaluation
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,06 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2023 (14) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 17 |