Combining Campbell Standards and the Realist Evaluation Approach
The Best of Two Worlds
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12470641 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Leontien M Van Der Knaap (Research and Documentation Centre (WODC), Ministry of Justice, Netherlands), Frans L Leeuw (0000-0002-9538-6043, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands), Stefan Bogaert (0000-0003-3776-3792, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, Netherlands), Laura T J Nijssen (Formerly Research and Documentation Centre (WODC), Ministry of Justice, Netherlands) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 29 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 48-57 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-01-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214007313024 |
| OpenAlex | W2150711552 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 21 |
| Referencias citadas | 30 |
This article presents an approach to systematic reviews that combines the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice standards and the realist notion of contexts-mechanisms-outcomes (CMO) configurations. Both approaches have their advantages and drawbacks, and the authors will make a case for combining both approaches to profit from their advantages without having to deal with their separate weaknesses. They proceed to discuss how their approach should be put into practice and illustrate its use by giving a concise description of an example from their own work on the effects of prevention of violence. The authors conclude with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of their suggested approach and state that combining Campbell standards and the realist evaluation approach should be done more often
Best practice · Business · Economics · Engineering ethics · Management science · Political science · Risk analysis (engineering · Sociology · Strengths and weaknesses · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Clarifying differences between review designs and methods
Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review
Gray literature
The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research
Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice
Judging Student Teacher Effectiveness
Is There an Evidence Basis for Immigrant Integration Policies
How does social learning facilitate urban disaster resilience? A systematic review
Financial education for HIV-vulnerable youth, orphans and vulnerable children
Fighting Crime by Fighting Misconceptions and Blind Spots in Policy Theories
What Works in Developing Nations to Get Children Into School or Keep Them There
Evaluation
Knowing from where to start
Learning from place-based flood prevention policies
Cyber society and digital policies
Building the house of evaluation
Dealing With Complex Causality in Realist Synthesis
The silencing of political context in health research in Ethiopia
The implementation and expansion of Safe
Mixed methods evaluation of a jail diversion program
Making qualitative data more visible in policy
Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences
Evidence-based Policy
The Uses of Argument
Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising
A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism
Experiments in knowing
Evidence-Based Crime Prevention
Evidence-based Policy
Evaluating ‘Communities that Care’
Reconstructing Program Theories
Reconstructing Program Theories
Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research
Meeting the Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy
What Works in Evaluation Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,24 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2009 - 2024 (16) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 21 |