Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Grades of Evidence

Variability in Quality of Findings in Effectiveness Studies of Complex Field Interventions

Bibliographic Data

ID12470864
AuthorsMadhabi Chatterji (0000-0002-7202-1375, Teachers College, Columbia University,, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume28
Issue3
Pages239-255
Publication date2007-08-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1098214007304884
OpenAlexW2063523274
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited18

This article argues with a literature review that a simplistic distinction between strong and weak evidence hinged on the use of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the federal “gold standard” for generating rigorous evidence on social programs and policies, is not tenable with evaluative studies of complex, field interventions such as those found in education. It introduces instead the concept of grades of evidence, illustrating how the choice of research designs coupled with the rigor with which they can be executed under field conditions, affects evidence quality progressively. It argues that evidence from effectiveness research should be graded on different design dimensions, accounting for conceptualization and execution aspects of a study. Well-implemented, phased designs using multiple research methods carry the highest potential to yield the best grade of evidence on effects of complex, field interventions

Conceptualization · Economics · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Evidence-based practice · Field (mathematics · Management science · Psychological intervention · Quality (philosophy · Research design · Social science · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Psychology

  • The Choice and Evaluation of Sexual Harassment Interventions in Institutions of Higher Education

    Open Access•Elissa L Perry•Educational Policy•2024

  • Challenges and Adjustments in a Multisite School-Based Randomized Field Trial

    Open Access•Debbie L Hahs‐vaughn, Christine Depies Destefano et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2024

  • Beyond the RCT

    Open Access•Lisa A Goodman, Deborah Epstein et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2017

  • Insight Into Evaluation Practice

    Open Access•Christina A Christie, Dreolin Nesbitt Fleischer•American Journal of Evaluation•2010

  • Negotiating Measurement

    Open Access•Marc T Braverman•American Journal of Evaluation•2013

  • Diagnosing bottlenecks in development-stage field experiments

    Open Access•Andrew P Jaciw, Lin Li et al.•Methodological Innovations•2018

  • Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors Associated With Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries (The Interheart Study)

    Open Access•Semir Yusuf, Salim Yusuf et al.•The Lancet•2004

  • What Doesn’t Work

    Open Access•Alan H Schoenfeld•Educational Researcher•2006

  • Transcending the Qualitative-Quantitative Debate

    Open Access•Gavriel Salomon•Educational Researcher•1991

  • Evidence on “What Works”

    Open Access•Madhabi Chatterji•Educational Researcher•2004

  • Scientific Culture and Educational Research

    Open Access•Michael J Feuer, Lisa Towne et al.•Educational Researcher•2002

  • The art of scientific investigation

    W I B Beveridge, William I Beveridge•Art of Scientific Investigation•1957

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2010 - 2024 (15)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae