Reclaiming Logic Modeling for Evaluation

A Theory of Action Framework

Bibliographic Data

ID12470874
AuthorsRebecca H Woodland (0000-0002-6350-4412, University of Massachusetts Amherst, corresponding author), Rebecca Mazur (0000-0001-9521-9192, Collaborative for Educational Services, Northampton, MA, USA)
Year2024
Volume45
Issue3
Pages326-340
Publication date2024-03-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10982140231224495
OpenAlexW4392798460
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited8

Logic modeling, the process that explicates how programs are constructed and theorized to bring about change, is considered to be standard evaluation practice. However, logic modeling is often experienced as a transactional, jargon-laden, discrete task undertaken to produce a document to comply with the expectations of an external entity, the consequences of which have minimal or even negative influence on the quality of program evaluation. This article presents the Logic Modeling Theory of Action Framework (LMTAF) which elucidates needs, resources, and central activities of logic modeling, and describes its potential evaluation-related benefits. The LMTAF situates evaluators as the primary intended users of logic modeling, and logic modeling as a fundamental element of each stage of a program evaluation life cycle. We aim to reassert the value of logic modeling for evaluation and provide evaluation practitioners a useful touchstone for reflective practice and future action

Action (physics · Action theory (sociology · Epistemology · Logic model · Management science · Process (computing · Programming language · Sociology · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science

Tools

Open DOI