The Nature and Frequency of Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Program Evaluation
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12470917 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Miriam R Jacobson (Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA, autor correspondente), Tarek Azzam (0000-0003-3864-0217, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA), Jeanette G Baez (Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 23-44 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-02-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | American Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214012461558 |
| OpenAlex | W2052036666 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 53 |
Although evaluation theorists over the last two decades have argued for the importance of including stakeholders from marginalized groups in program planning and research, little is known about the degree of inclusion in program evaluation practice. In particular, we know little about the type and level of inclusion of people with intellectual, developmental, and psychiatric disabilities in the evaluation of programs that aim to serve them. Through a content analysis of articles published in the last decade describing evaluations of programs for people with these types of disabilities, this article describes which stakeholders have been included in evaluations, how program recipient input was obtained, and in which stages of the evaluation stakeholder participation occurred. The findings indicate that program recipient disability type (developmental, psychiatric, or other) may predict type and level of inclusion, and inclusion tends to occur in later parts of the evaluation process
Evaluation methods · Inclusion (mineral · Intellectual disability · Medical education · Political science · Process (computing · Program evaluation · Psychiatry · Public relations · Stakeholder · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Disability Education and Employment · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology · Social Psychology
Between consultation and partnership
Evaluative criteria in practice
Toward the Development of Reporting Standards for Evaluations
Quantitative Evaluation Based on Participants’ Qualitative Feedback -NSF’s I/UCRC Program, 1993-2009
Participatory and Inclusive Approaches to Disability Program Evaluation
The State of the Empirical Research Literature on Stakeholder Involvement in Program Evaluation
Participatory Assessment of Development Interventions
Framing participatory evaluation
What Guides Evaluation? A Study of How Evaluation Practice Maps onto Evaluation Theory
What have we learned about stakeholder involvement in program evaluation
Youth Voices
A Review and Synthesis of Current Research on Cross-Cultural Evaluation
Patients as Partners in Responsive Research
Involving people with learning disabilities in research
Transformative Paradigm
Sins of Omission and Commission
Insight Into Evaluation Practice
Focus Group Design and Group Dynamics
Emphasizing Cultural Competence in Evaluation
Inclusive Evaluation
Using System Dynamics as an Evaluation Tool
Stakeholder Participation for the Purpose of Helping Ensure Evaluation Validity
Evaluation Use
Invisible Ubiquity
Evaluator Characteristics and Methodological Choice
Evaluator Responsiveness to Stakeholders
Transformative Considerations
The Validation of the Evaluation Involvement Scale for Use in Multisite Settings
Participation of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities and Families on Advisory Boards and Committees
What a Difference a Decade Makes
The Involvement of Users and Carers in Health and Social Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,54 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2013 - 2025 (13) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |