Crowdsourcing Qualitative Thematic Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12470937 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lara Hilton (0000-0003-2375-8810, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Los Angeles, CA, USA, corresponding author), Tarek Azzam (0000-0003-3864-0217, Claremont Graduate University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 575-589 |
| Publication date | 2019-04-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214019836674 |
| OpenAlex | W2938428767 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 20 |
Evaluations that include stakeholders aim to understand their perspectives and to ensure that their views are represented. This article offers a new approach to gaining stakeholder perspectives through crowdsourcing. We recruited a sample of individuals with chronic low back pain through a crowdsourcing site. This sample coded textual data describing pain, provided themes, and provided feedback on constructs and procedures. The results generated by the crowdsourced participants were compared to results generated by experts. We found that crowdsourcing to develop code and textual responses was feasible, rapid, and inexpensive, offering the potential to enhance patient stakeholder engagement in evaluation. Crowdsourcing has broad implications for evaluation science beyond the health sector
Crowdsourcing · Data science · Knowledge management · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sample (material · Social science · Sociology · Stakeholder · Thematic analysis · World Wide Web · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Psychology
Using Mechanical Turk to Study Clinical Populations
Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace
Inside the Turk
Amazon's Mechanical Turk
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Finding a Comparison Group
Data Collection in a Flat World
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research
The impact of overtly listing eligibility requirements on MTurk
Techniques to Identify Themes
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |