Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Sustainable Development Goal for Urban Sanitation

Africa’s Statistical Tragedy Continues

Bibliographic Data

ID12472864
AuthorsRobert M Buckley (0000-0002-0025-919X, New School, corresponding author), Achilles Kallergis (New School)
Year2018
Volume96
Issue1
Pages123-130
Publication date2018-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Urban Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1099-3460 • E-ISSN: 1468-2869
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s11524-018-0267-1
PMID29858977
OpenAlexW2805121430
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

Sanitation delivery in the urban areas of sub-Saharan African countries has been a chronic issue, particularly difficult to tackle. Under the Millennium Development Goals, the sanitation target in urban sub-Saharan Africa was missed by a wide margin and witnessed almost no improvement. After 2 years of review, the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme published a new measure of access to sanitation as a baseline for the Sustainable Development Goals. There are a number of improvements in the new measure. However, despite the improvements, the new measure continues to be characterized by an important flaw: it continues to disregard how shared toilet facilities contribute towards the SDG sanitation target. As a result, the new measure does not indicate whether progress is being made in low-income urban areas where a large number of households rely on shared sanitation; nor does it provide a goal that can be achieved in cities of the poorest countries over the measurement period. But, its most egregious failing is that it directs resources towards investments which will often fail cost/benefit tests. In sum, it is not a surprise that a Working Group recommended that the measure should be changed to include some shared facilities. Following the Working Group's recommendation would have avoided the adverse consequences of continued reliance on a key component of the methodology used for monitoring sanitation improvements under the Millennium Development Goals. The paper discusses the limitations of this methodology in the context of urban sub-Saharan Africa, where current sanitation conditions are seriously lacking, and the significant future urban population growth will add more pressure for the delivery of vital sanitation services

Baseline (sea · Business · Context (archaeology · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Improved sanitation · Millennium Development Goals · Open defecation · Political science · Sanitation · Sustainable development · Toilet · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Engineering · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Environmental Engineering

  • Meeting Wash SDG6

    Open Access•Pascale Hofmann•Environment and Urbanization•2020

  • Citizen engagement body of knowledge – A fuzzy decision maker for index-term selection in built environment projects

    Open Access•Farzaneh Zarei, Mazdak Nik-Bakht et al.•Cities•2021

  • Africa's Cities

    Somik Vinay Lall, J Vernon Henderson et al.•Africa's Cities•2017

  • Hygiene, Sanitation, and Water

    Open Access•John Bartram, Jamie Bartram et al.•PLoS Medicine•2010

  • Impact of drinking water, sanitation and handwashing with soap on childhood diarrhoeal disease

    Open Access•Jennyfer Wolf, Paul R Hunter et al.•Tropical Medicine & International…•2018

  • Sharing reflections on inclusive sanitation

    Open Access•Evans Banana, Patrick Chiza Chikoti et al.•Environment and Urbanization•2015

  • The Importance of Social Intervention in Britain's Mortality Decline c .1850–1914

    Simon Szreter•Social History of Medicine•1988

  • The Economics of Slums in the Developing World

    Open Access•Benjamin Marx, Thomas Stoker et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2013

  • Deadly Cities? Spatial Inequalities in Mortality in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Isabel Günther, Kenneth Harttgen•Population and Development Review•2012

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2021 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae