Perceived utility of emotion
The structure and construct validity of the Perceived Affect Utility Scale in a cross-ethnic sample
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12475283 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip I Chow (0000-0002-1147-1145, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author), Howard Berenbaum (0000-0003-4610-2195, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 55-63 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1099-9809 • E-ISSN: 1939-0106 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0026711 |
| PMID | 22250898 |
| OpenAlex | W2088380237 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 20 |
This study introduces a new measure of the perceived utility of emotion, which is the degree to which emotions are perceived to be useful in achieving goals. In this study, we administered this new measure, the Perceived Affect Utility Scale (PAUSe), to a sample of 142 European American and 156 East Asian American college students. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a new, culturally informed parsing of emotion and for perceived utility of emotion to be distinguishable from ideal affect, a related but separate construct. Next, we explored the potential importance of perceived utility of emotion in cultural research. Through path analyses, we found that: (a) culturally relevant variables (e.g., independence) played a mediating role in the link between ethnic group and perceived utility of emotion; and (b) perceived utility of emotion played a mediating role in the link between culturally relevant variables and ideal affect. In particular, perceived utility of self-centered emotions (e.g., pride) was found to be associated with independence and ideal affect of those same emotions. In contrast, perceived utility of other-centered emotions (e.g., appreciation) was found to be associated with interdependence, dutifulness/self-discipline, and ideal affect of those same emotions. Implications for perceived utility of emotion in understanding cultural factors are discussed
Affect (linguistics · Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct (python library · Ethnic group · Pride · Sample (material · Scale (ratio · Structural equation modeling · Cultural Differences and Values · International Student and Expatriate Challenges · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Measuring emotion beliefs
Examining Multiracial Pride, Identity-Based Challenges, and Discrimination
Patients respond more positively to physicians who focus on their ideal affect
Investigating psychiatric symptoms as predictors of the reasons people do not regulate their emotions in daily life
Beliefs about emotion usefulness are nuanced
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
Functional Accounts of Emotions
How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought
Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else
Hedonic and Instrumental Motives in Anger Regulation
The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals
Business or pleasure? Utilitarian versus hedonic considerations in emotion regulation
The socialization of prosocial behavioral tendencies among Mexican American adolescents
Risk and resilience in low-income African American families
Acculturation, social connectedness, and subjective well-being
Cultural Mistrust and Mental Health Services for African Americans
Race and gender matter
Perceptions of Racism and Depressive Symptoms in African American Adolescents
Cultural variation in affect valuation
Culture and the self
Acculturation, Enculturation, Perceived Racism, Minority Status Stressors, and Psychological Symptomatology Among Latino/as
Culture, Emotion, and Well-being
The Structure of Current Affect
Cultural Differences in Self-Evaluation
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,42 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |