Checking the underlying structure of R-SPQ-2F using covariance structure analysis / Comprobación de la estructura subyacente del R-SPQ-2F mediante análisis de estructura de covarianza
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12485652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mercedes López Aguado (0000-0002-4822-6901, Universidad de León, corresponding author), María Lourdes Gutiérrez Provecho (0000-0003-3822-2496, Universidad de León) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 105-141 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Culture and Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1135-6405 • E-ISSN: 1578-4118 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/11356405.2017.1416787 |
| OpenAlex | W2783416835 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 31 |
The R-SPQ-2F is an instrument used in many studies to measure learning approaches. However, its internal structure is still a matter of debate. It is important to confirm its underlying structure in order to find out which variables are being measured with it. A survey method is used with 279 students of the Faculty of Education at the University of León, and alternative models found in the literature are compared using covariance structure analysis, specifically, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). We conclude that the structure that best fits the data is a two-factor structure in line with the results obtained in other studies. Future research should take these two primary factors into account when interpreting their findings. Solutions are also offered for improving the scale with the original 20 items
Analysis of covariance · Confirmatory factor analysis · Covariance · Humanities · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology
Study Approaches of Life Science Students Using the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F)
Toward Sustainable Teacher Education
University students’ learning approaches
Short form of revised two-factor study process questionnaire
Adaptation and validation of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) for tertiary physical education contexts in China
Factor
Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations
The Impact of Categorization With Confirmatory Factor Analysis
The Performance of ML, GLS, and WLS Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling Under Conditions of Misspecification and Nonnormality
Factor 9.2
Notes on Factorial Invariance
Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using Amos Graphics
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Common method biases in behavioral research
An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data.
In Search of Golden Rules
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures
The adaptation and validation of the CEQ and the R-SPQ-2F to the Japanese tertiary environment
The revised learning process questionnaire
A validity study of Biggs' three-factor model of learning approaches
The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |