What Makes Good Trilateralism? Theorizing the Utilities of Trilateralism in East Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12498237 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Muhui Zhang (0000-0001-9692-5494, Pusan National University, South Korea, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 436-462 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pacific Focus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1225-4657 • E-ISSN: 1976-5118 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/pafo.12170 |
| OpenAlex | W3111930773 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 33 |
In recent decades, the development of trilateral institutions has proliferated widely in East Asia. Inspired by an analysis of minilateralism, prevailing studies have spoken highly of trilateralism, as trilateral groupings offer greater outputs for regional community building. In contrast to the prevailing optimism, this study argues that trilateralism – the miniature form of multilateralism – is not unconditionally “good.” A three‐party arrangement is seen as potentially problematic, and its effectiveness is not guaranteed. This research examines two potential structural uncertainties for trilateralism in East Asia, which are the efficiency problem and the solidarity problem. This article sets up a theoretical model for examining the utility and operability of trilateralism in East Asia, and presents a cost–benefit analysis by comparing the utility of trilateralism with those of bilateralism and multilateralism. In East Asia, countries have been struggling with bilateral conflicts, and the prevailing logic of rivalry has led to the pursuits of “relative gains.” Thus, three preconditions are required in order to establish a “good” trilateralism: firm shared interests that prevent trilateral agreements to be eclipsed by embedded bilateral approaches, stable bilateral ties that ensure the operability of trilateral arrangements, and an effective leading country for implementing coherent policy responses. This article also enacts theories into practices and explains the performances of three trilateral relations (US–Japan–Australia, US–Japan–Korea, and China–Japan–Korea) in East Asia
Bilateralism · China · Development economics · East Asia · Economic system · Economics · International trade · Macroeconomics · Multilateralism · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Rivalry · Solidarity · European Union Policy and Governance · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
Does the United States Need a New East Asian Anchor?
Cooperation under Anarchy
Local Commons and Global Interdependence
The Politics of Scope
Japan’s ‘Resentful Realism’ and Balancing China’s Rise
Japan’s Growing Hard Hedge Against China
Buffers, Not Bridges
The China–Japan–Korea Trilateral Free Trade Agreement
The Alliance Transformation and US–Japan–Korea Security Network
U.S. ‘Minilateralism’ in Asia and China’s Responses
Responses to ‘Rising China’ in the East Asian Region
Minilateral security's relevance to US strategy in the Indo-Pacific
Proceeding in hardship
After a decade of strategic partnership
Alignment’ , not ‘alliance’ – the shifting paradigm of international security cooperation
Comparing Japanese and South Korean Strategies toward China and the United States
South Korea’s Strategy toward a Rising China, Security Dynamics in East Asia, and International Relations Theory
The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia
Can Trade Help Overcome Economic Crisis? Implications for Northeast Asia Creating Regional FTA between Korea, China, and Japan and Mega FTAs such as RCEP and TPP
International relations theory and multilateralism
Multilateralism with small and large numbers
In Search of Regional Governance in East Asia
Japan-Australia security cooperation in the bilateral and multilateral contexts
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |