Les mutations de la gouvernance mondiale
Pays émergents et groupes « G »
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12510046 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jochen Prantl (0000-0001-8920-447X, Ministère des Armées, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 39-56 |
| Publication date | 2012-07-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critique internationale (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1290-7839 • E-ISSN: 1777-554X |
| Publisher | Presses de Sciences Po (PUBLISHER • FR) |
| DOI | 10.3917/crii.056.0039 |
| OpenAlex | W2040680081 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 3 |
International cooperation is criticized by emerging powers as too Western-centric. Western powers themselves are equally critical of international cooperation for failing adequately to harness emerging powers. Existing theories of cooperation assume a stable geo-political order, led by countries with a shared conception of the scope and modalities of global cooperation. These assumptions are no longer justified. ‘Western liberal order’ is in a protracted process of transition. However, there is no new hegemon that would be able (or willing) to replace the United States and to push for a redesign of the global governance architecture from scratch. Emerging powers are engaging in global cooperation in their own way and on their own terms. In sum, while there seems to be a growing demand for effective global cooperation, there are no longer universally applicable concepts to analyze it nor a common language with which to describe it. This paper looks at the changing structural conditions of international cooperation in a period of order transition by examining the dynamics between emerging countries and G-x groups. It develops the argument that G-x groupings offer platforms to renegotiate the underlying constitutional bargain of the Western liberal order. The huge asymmetries of power in the post-Cold War international system and the substantial (structural) challenges of the Western liberal order has led to growing recourse to informal institutions. They have come to play a range of critical roles and occupy a vital space between multilateral governance on the one hand and traditional major power diplomacy on the other. This paper develops an analytical framework able to explain the changing nature of cooperation under power transition
Argument (complex analysis · Corporate governance · Diplomacy · Economics · Global governance · Hegemony · International relations · Law and economics · Management · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Scope (computer science · Sociology · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law
| Citations per year | 0.27 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2019 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |