Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Análisis comparado de las políticas públicas y mejores prácticas de transparencia en Ecuador 2004-2014

Bibliographic Data

ID12515917
AuthorsIrma Jara Íñiguez (0000-0002-6342-4068, corresponding author)
Year2017
Issue67
Pages197-226
Publication date2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReforma y democracia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1315-2378 • E-ISSN: 2443-4620
PublisherCentro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo (PUBLISHER • VE)
DOI10.69733/clad.ryd.n67.a131
OpenAlexW2914388419
LanguageES

The American States during the 2000s adopted several principles in the area of transparency and access to information. To achieve change their practices has been necessary to develop the respective institutional frameworks and implement actions to ensure their effectiveness in a digital age, which in turn has increased the demand for information from the citizens. In Ecuador, from May 2004, it has Organic Law of Transparency and Access to Public Informatio; in February 2007 declared as a State policy the combat against corruption in public administration, and in 2008 with the new Constitution of the Republic, the Function of Transparency and Social Control, among others, is created to protect the exercise and enforcement of rights, prevent and combat corruption and to promote and encourage citizen participation. This is a case study about Ecuador for the period 2004-2014, which analyzes the progress and degree of coherence between the rules and instruments developed and actions implemented from the State Institutions, regarding transparency in public administration. It identifies best practices and contrasts with the results obtained in international measurements. It was used a qualitative and documentary analysis, with a scheme based on a diachronic comparison. Two phases were determined, taking into account as relevant aspect the Constitutional changes, and these as a essential context for the public actions and the institutional changes made. The identification of best practices is made on the basis of an analysis and valuation in binary form, being mainly: technical instruments homologated, technological systems of varying complexity, creation of public spaces for citizen participation, community spaces, inclusive regulations, codes of ethics, accessibility and training. It is evident that as the institutional framework is developed and the mechanisms and tools of government transparency are strengthened, the perception of corruption decreased slightly. The research efforts subsequent to this article may focus on outcomes in terms of the sustainability of good practices and its relation with the perception of corruption

Political science · Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues · Health, Medicine and Society · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae