Judicial Innovation and Local Politics

Judicialization of Administrative Governance in East China

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12519331
AutoresXin He (0000-0002-9814-1666, City University of Hong Kong, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen69
Páginas20-42
Fecha de publicación2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe China Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1324-9347 • E-ISSN: 1835-8535
EditorialUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/668805
OpenAlexW2087954067
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas13
Referencias citadas8

Drawing on data from a mid-sized city in eastern China, this article examines interactions among the courts, the Party and other administrative agencies. It finds that, caught between unruly administrative agencies and legal rhetoric, the courts seek support from the Party to enhance their authority. They then devise tactics such as putting agencies' chief officials on the stand, issuing judicial suggestions and applying the laws in innovative ways. These are often effective, because agencies adjust their behaviors accordingly. Contrary to conventional wisdom that the courts are only a passive actor in local politics, their role in translating national laws into local practice is by no means negligible. By exploring the dynamics of court–government relations in the context of administrative litigation, this article argues that local politics is a crucial factor in determining the trajectory of China's judicialization of administrative governance, and rule of law more generally

Administrative law · China · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Economics · Government (linguistics · Judicial reform · Local government · Management · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal principles and applications · Public Administration