Farmer Cooperatives and the Limits of Agricultural Reform in Rural Hubei
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12520397 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brooke Wilmsen (0000-0002-0970-7673, corresponding author), Sarah Rogers (0000-0003-0437-5187), Yuefang Duan (0000-0001-5002-7234), Ju‐han Zoe Wang (0000-0003-3303-7013) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Pages | 1-23 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The China Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1324-9347 • E-ISSN: 1835-8535 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/722258 |
| OpenAlex | W4309474013 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 41 |
There has been remarkable growth in the number of cooperatives in China in the past decade. This article asks: what role are cooperatives playing in driving China’s ambitious agricultural reforms? The scholarly literature describes farmer cooperatives as either an important entity for progressing China’s rural modernization agenda, a vehicle of exploitation and dispossession of smallholder farmers, or evidence of broader commitment to grassroots solidarity. Despite the rapid expansion of farmer cooperatives, the role that they play in the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in places where agriculture remains central and out-migration is low is poorly understood. To explore this, in 2019 we conducted a survey of 266 households in the mountains of Hubei Province. To illuminate the politics and dynamics on the ground, we followed up by conducting in-depth interviews with agribusinesses, cooperatives, households, and local government officials. Our findings suggest that although cooperatives are attempting to engage with smallholders, they are neither integrating nor exploiting them. While seemingly innocuous to the livelihoods of smallholder farmers, these entities serve a mostly political function, and it is in these dynamics that we observe the limits of agricultural reform. Where smallholder production is lucrative, land is valuable, and out-migration is minimal, local government appears to be “performing” reform, without forcing it on smallholders and thereby harming the local economy or risking social unrest
Agriculture · Business · China · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Government (linguistics · Grassroots · Livelihood · Modernization theory · Political science · Politics · Solidarity · Unrest · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact · Mining and Resource Management
The role of the third sector in China’s agri-food transitions
What factors influence the vertical integration of agricultural cooperatives?—Evidence from 500 cooperatives in Heilongjiang, China
In the shadow of state-led agrarian reforms
Rural imaginaries in China's Three Gorges region
Farmers’ practices and the political ecology of agrochemicals in rural China
Putting ‘rupture’ to work at the Three Gorges Dam
The effect of trust and social pressure on member commitment in agricultural cooperatives – Evidence from China
Impact of cooperative membership on market performance of Nepali goat farmers
Tilling sand
Betting on the Big
Farmers’ Cooperatives in China
What, then, is a Chinese peasant? Nongmin discourses and agroindustrialization in contemporary China
From left behind to leader
Farmers’ behaviors and performance in cooperatives in Jilin Province of China
CEOs versus members’ evaluation of cooperative performance
Situation features and governance structure of farmer cooperatives in China
Distributional effects of agricultural cooperatives in China
Contractual arrangements between farmer cooperatives and buyers in China
After the Deluge
Evaluating the cooperative and family farm programs in China
Wasting the rural
China’s New-Age Small Farms and Their Vertical Integration
E-Commerce, Taobao Villages and Regional Development in China
Agrarian Capitalization without Capitalism? Capitalist Dynamics from Above and Below inChina
Mobilizing compliance
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |