Operationalizing austerity
The role of transnational professional service firms in local government restructuring
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12530773 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chris Hurl (Concordia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 55-67 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1351-1610 • E-ISSN: 1469-8412 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13511610.2017.1415805 |
| OpenAlex | W2772345676 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 37 |
Since the 2008 economic crisis, the “Big Four” professional service firms (KPMG, Deloitte, PwC, Ernst and Young) have aggressively targeted the public sector with the aim of expanding their market in management consulting. As a part of these efforts, they have packaged and promoted service delivery reviews to local governments, offering consultations with the aim of identifying areas where savings can be accrued and services streamlined. Taking up Toronto’s Core Service Review (2011) as a case study, this paper examines the efforts of KPMG consultants to operationalize austerity through generating a metric that classifies and gauges the relative necessity of public services. Drawing from the recent literature on neoliberal governmentality, urban policy mobilities, and the sociology of expertise, I examine the conditions of possibility for the production of this metric. Specifically, what kinds of schema were deployed in determining whether a service is a “must-have” or merely a “nice-to-have”? What forms of expertise were relied upon? And to what extent were these experts able to position themselves as authorities in speaking to the proper levels of service delivery? Finally, exploring the public response to KPMG’s final report, I trace the various ways in which local actors have contested the logic of austerity, advancing alternative understandings of public service standards rooted in moral economies of community well-being and accountability
Accountability · Austerity · Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Economy · Governmentality · Management · Operationalization · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Public sector · Public service · Restructuring · Service (business · Service delivery framework · Sociology · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration · Finance · Marketing
The Extended Local State Under Financialized Capitalism
Comprendre le pouvoir des grands cabinets de conseil dans l’élaboration de l’action publique en tant que fournisseurs de professionnels et d’infrastructures
The Value of Planning
Seeding the cloud
Private consulting firms’ intervention in public health policymaking
Beyond consultocracy and servants of power
Outsourcing the Business of Development
The Moral Economy of Cities
The World's Newest Profession
Think Tanks in America
The Limits of Neoliberalism
Building the New Managerialist State
State-led Privatisation and the Demise of the Democratic State
Fast Policy
Urban fortunes
The New Localism, Anti-Political Development Machines, and the Role of Planning Consultants
Austerity in the city
Austerity urbanism
Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance
Economic crisis, accountability, and the state’s coercive assault on public education in the USA
A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research
Assemblages of State Power
Urban Politics Reconsidered
The “Indefinite Discipline” of Competitiveness Benchmarking as a Neoliberal Technology of Government
Colonizing Knowledge
(Dis)Assembling policy pipelines
Audit Cultures
Partnerships and the role of financial advisors
Geographies of policy
Researching the Geographies of Policy Mobility
The Antinomies of the Postpolitical City
The Discipline of Rankings
Financializing Detroit
Elite Power under Advanced Neoliberalism
Commensuration as a Social Process
Rankings and Reactivity
On mediators
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |