Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Open government partnership

Unutilized potential in post-communist EU members? (Case of the Czech Republic)

Bibliographic Data

ID12530916
AuthorsŠárka Laboutková (0000-0001-7108-2144, Technical University of Liberec, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume31
Issue3
Pages350-376
Publication date2017-12-12
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInnovation The European Journal of Social Science Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1351-1610 • E-ISSN: 1469-8412
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13511610.2017.1415803
OpenAlexW2773810879
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited16

One of the factors that contribute to confining corruption opportunity space is transparent lobbying as part of a broader approach to governance, based on the principles of openness, transparency, participation and disclosure. The problem of lack of transparent lobbying is closely related not only to corruption but to increased inequality of access by voices representative of a wide range of interests to public decision-making. This issue is also one of the relevant issues of Europeanisation that comes to attention in the European public space; lobbying is an important source of information for European decision-making processes, which speaks in favour of creating transparent rules for its functioning. Despite a real reluctance of national political representation to enforce statutory regulation of lobbying there is however a number of factors (besides regulation) that contribute to the transparency of lobbying. One of them is Open Government Partnership initiative which takes a more comprehensive approach to openness via seeking ways to make the government more transparent, responsive, accountable, and effective. The paper focuses on two research questions: Under what circumstances may open government affect the transparency of lobbying and thereby reduce the corruption opportunity space? Does the Czech Republic use the potential of its membership in Open Government Partnership well? The analysis is completed by data from Bulgaria, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania and Slovakia. The performed research uses descriptive, analytic, comparative and interpretive techniques

Business · Corporate governance · Czech · Europeanisation · General partnership · Government (linguistics · Language change · Legitimacy · Open government · Openness to experience · Political science · Politics · Public participation · Public relations · Transparency (behavior · Corruption and Economic Development · Law · Public Administration

  • Enhancing Public Management Through Integrity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

    Nika Saputra, Roni Ekha Putera et al.•International Journal of Public…•2026

  • Joining the open government partnership initiative

    Open Access•Antonio F Tavares, Pedro Jorge Sobral Camões et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • What Determines Corporate Transparency?

    Open Access•ROBERT M BUSHMAN, JOSEPH D PIOTROSKI et al.•Journal of Accounting Research•2004

  • Analysing and Assessing Accountability

    Open Access•Mark Bovens•European Law Journal•2007

  • Corruption, Connections and Transparency

    Open Access•Mehmet Bac•Public Choice•2001

  • Fiscal Transparency

    Open Access•David Heald•Public Administration•2003

  • From Reflections on Post-Communism to Perspectives on Europeanization

    Open Access•Karel Müller, Karel B Müller et al.•International Political Science…•2009

  • Lobbying as a Communication Process

    Lester W Milbrath•Public Opinion Quarterly•1960

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae