Black card’ or rational bargaining strategies? On the difficulties involved in mastering technology effects by means of interactive processes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12530980 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabine Pohoryles‐Drexel (corresponding author), Ronald J Pohoryles (0000-0001-5072-673X, International Centre for Comparative Criminology) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 481-497 |
| Publication date | 1993-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1351-1610 • E-ISSN: 1469-8412 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13511610.1993.9968374 |
| OpenAlex | W1974458976 |
| Language | EN |
The present paper has two objectives in mind: On the one hand, it attempts to present and clarify the attitudes of the Austrian population on ecological issues. On the other hand, its second objective is to explicate, via a documentation and discourse analysis of a discussion on the ‘social compatibility’ of the location of radioactive waste disposal sites, how the notion of ‘social impact assessment’ ought to be interpreted as a strategic game among social actors, revolving around the poles of conflict and rational concensus‐building
Business · Documentation · Political science · Population · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Risk Perception and Management · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|