Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Revisiting the anti- mushā ʿ reforms in the levant

Origins, scale and outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID12533463
AuthorsAmos Nadan (0000-0002-7471-1396, Tel Aviv University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume47
Issue4
Pages595-611
Publication date2018-10-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Middle Eastern Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1353-0194 • E-ISSN: 1469-3542
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13530194.2018.1533451
OpenAlexW2897714554
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The historiography of the abolition of repartitioned mushāʿ—the practice of parcels substitution among cultivators in peasant communities—is mistakenly traced back to the Ottoman Land Code of 1858. Neither that Code, nor Ottoman land registration, attempted the abolition of this type of mushāʿ. It was instead the abolition ordinances of the British and French Mandatory governments during the 1920s which began a conflict over land titles. The common estimates of that time suggest about 50 per cent of the lands in the Levant were held under repartitioned mushāʿ, but this was an exaggeration for most localities. French officials in Syria and Lebanon were not unanimous in opposing mushāʿ and in practice resorted to a laissez-faire policy. The British, however, annulled the legal titles to large areas of repartitioned mushāʿ lands in Palestine and Transjordan, wrongly believing this would increase investment in and productivity of cultivated lands. Their view was backed by Zionist experts, possibly due to the realization that the abolition of mushāʿ would facilitate Jewish land purchases

Ancient history · Archaeology · Economic growth · Economic history · Economics · Exaggeration · Geography · Historiography · Judaism · Peasant · Political science · Productivity · Scale (ratio · History · Islamic Studies and History · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Middle East Politics and Society

  • Reconsidering peasant communes in the Levant, c . 1850s–1940s

    Open Access•Amos Nadan•The Economic History Review•2020

  • Bibliography of Periodical Literature 16 August–15 November 2020

    Norbert Scholz•Journal of Palestine Studies•2021

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2020 - 2021 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae