The Anglo-Iranian oil crisis revisited
World Bank and Truman-Churchill proposals rejoinder to Mr Gorjestani
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12533726 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Homa Katouzian (Universty of Oxford, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 119-129 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1353-0194 • E-ISSN: 1469-3542 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13530194.2024.2443907 |
| OpenAlex | W4405890405 |
| Language | EN |
Mr Gorjestani has ignored almost the entire evidence in my article on the reasons why Iran rejected both the World Bank intervention and the second Anglo-American proposal, and why both those rejections were grave mistakes and led to the 1953 coup and fall of Mosaddeq's government, which was by no means inevitable if only because inevitability is itself an unscientific concept
Economic history · Economic interventionism · Economics · Government (linguistics · Intervention (counseling · Political science · Politics · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Global Energy Security and Policy · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|